Teams

Canyon Creek/Jost X7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & over MIXED Sunday · X7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Oak Creek/Christian X7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Cotter / Carl Cotter vs Kara Jenkins / Terence Whitaker5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTami Jost / Evan Pounds vs Laura Barrow / Brent Barrow6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHolly Clapp / Eric Beshires vs Sabrina Greene / Russell Roberts2-6, 5-7
2025-07-13vs Fretz/Livengood X7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Cotter / Carl Cotter vs JOSALYN SAMSON / William Manhkong3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurin Shambora / James Marshall vs Tina Hoang / Robert Cox3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Ragle / Doug Hipskind vs Ryan Livengood / Courtney Vorel2-6, 4-6
2025-06-29vs High Point/Kurinji X7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesApril Moeser / Evan Pounds vs Phong Le / Chun Lin1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMRecia Beshires / William Ragle vs Jennifer Bishop / Kurinji Sathasivam5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Ragle / Doug Hipskind vs Christine Slote / Jeff Peatrowsky4-6, 4-6
2025-06-22vs The Nelson/Harner X7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Jost / Tami Jost vs Christopher Harner / Kaitlyn Scott2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Hipskind / Laurin Shambora vs Stephen James / Jacie Vittitow6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Rodolfo Gonzalez vs Matt Vittitow / Amber James2-6, 1-6
2025-06-15vs Garland/Lv X7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Moeser / James Marshall vs Aesun Park / Wei-Bin Lai4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMRecia Beshires / William Ragle vs Kunrong Matthews / Cheng Wang6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Rodolfo Gonzalez vs Tao Kang / Kuangting Shiue6-4, 7-6
2025-06-08vs Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesHolly Clapp / William Ragle vs Leigh Powell / Niven Padachy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTami Jost / James Marshall vs Keith Powell / Taylor Walker7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Ragle / Doug Hipskind vs Kathleen Nuytten / Isaac Mckee6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · X7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garland/Nguyen X7.0601626115
2Oak Creek/Coates X7.051162588
3Fretz/Livengood X7.05114413140
4Garland/Lv X7.05113515141
5The Nelson/Harner X7.04213515135
6Oak Creek/Christian X7.0339920180
7Bent Tree/Sarche X7.03381022173
8Fretz/Conwill X7.03361225178
9McKinney/Hong X7.02481023176
10High Point/Kurinji X7.02461224181
11Greenhill/Sanders-Madden X7.01551327182
12Canyon Creek/Jost X7.01551327186
13Chandlers Landing/Meacham X7.01541429194
14Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.01531533208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Carl Cotter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Laurin Shambora
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
April Moeser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Tami Jost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Scott Butcher
published
3.27
James Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Doug Hipskind
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Evan Pounds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Lisa Ragle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Holly Clapp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.09
Brad Jost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Eric Beshires
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Rodolfo Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Dawn Cotter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
MRecia Beshires
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Ragle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tami Jost + Brad Jost134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Ragle + Doug Hipskind123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carl Cotter
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Laurin Shambora
50W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
April Moeser
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Tami Jost
49W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Scott Butcher
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
James Marshall
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Doug Hipskind
31W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Evan Pounds
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Lisa Ragle
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.21
3
Holly Clapp
21W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3.5
Brad Jost
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Eric Beshires
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Rodolfo Gonzalez
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Dawn Cotter
9W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
MRecia Beshires
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Ragle
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.