Teams

Garland/Nguyen X7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & over MIXED Sunday · X7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.79 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Chandlers Landing/Meacham X7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarifi Rivera / Vinh Nguyen vs SUSAN DEERE / Chad Meacham6-3, 6-1
2025-07-20vs Bent Tree/Sarche X7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesTrinh Nguyen / Tri Doan vs Cynthia Wilder / Steve Matheny6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLaya Gan / Kevin Luong vs Emily Sarche / Shea Wilder6-4, 6-3
2025-06-29vs Fretz/Conwill X7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Luong / Jacqueline Niba vs Keaton Luptowski / Jesus Ibanez6-4, 6-3
2025-06-22vs McKinney/Hong X7.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesTri Doan / Rosalyn Luong vs Teo Valdez / Emily Ullom6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChandrakant Dharme / Laya Gan vs Kellen Hong / XAVIER OROZCO1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-15vs Greenhill/Sanders-Madden X7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesHung Dang / Jacqueline Niba vs Kevin Womack / Jennifer Mays6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYong Dai / Marifi Rivera vs Gerilynn Sanders / Andy Kaplinsky6-2, 6-1
2025-06-08vs Oak Creek/Coates X7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesJimmy Tu / Rosalyn Luong vs Calvin McDonald / Stephanie King4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTrinh Nguyen / Tri Doan vs Tony Le / Varina Lin6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · X7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garland/Nguyen X7.0601626115
2Oak Creek/Coates X7.051162588
3Fretz/Livengood X7.05114413140
4Garland/Lv X7.05113515141
5The Nelson/Harner X7.04213515135
6Oak Creek/Christian X7.0339920180
7Bent Tree/Sarche X7.03381022173
8Fretz/Conwill X7.03361225178
9McKinney/Hong X7.02481023176
10High Point/Kurinji X7.02461224181
11Greenhill/Sanders-Madden X7.01551327182
12Canyon Creek/Jost X7.01551327186
13Chandlers Landing/Meacham X7.01541429194
14Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.01531533208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ha Tran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
James Vo
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.78
Daniel Jean
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hung Dang
published 4
3.69
Rosalyn Luong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Yong Dai
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Ella Li
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Chandrakant Dharme
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Karen Saland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Jeffrey Yarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jacqueline Niba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Tri Doan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Laya Gan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jimmy Tu
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Marifi Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jing Zhuang
published
Kim Le
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kyle Richard
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Tram Pham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ha Tran
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
James Vo
22W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Daniel Jean
20W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Hung Dang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosalyn Luong
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Yong Dai
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ella Li
42W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Chandrakant Dharme
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Karen Saland
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jeffrey Yarbrough
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Jacqueline Niba
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Tri Doan
25W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Laya Gan
44W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Jimmy Tu
25W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Marifi Rivera
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Jing Zhuang
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Le
43W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Richard
44W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tram Pham
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.