Teams

Oak Creek/Christian X7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & over MIXED Sunday · X7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Canyon Creek/Jost X7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKara Jenkins / Terence Whitaker vs Dawn Cotter / Carl Cotter7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSabrina Greene / Russell Roberts vs Holly Clapp / Eric Beshires6-2, 7-5
2025-07-20vs Fretz/Livengood X7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmber Playle / Raj Sidhu vs Courtney Vorel / Gustavo Lopez6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKilvia Edwards / Lance Christian vs REGINA RIVERA / Jason Vorel0-6, 5-7
2025-07-13vs High Point/Kurinji X7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesTerence Whitaker / Amanda Fritz vs Kelly Britson / Minas Hambardzumyan6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKilvia Edwards / Kyle Minton vs Aliaksandra Holub Filistovich / David Hutchison7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Barrow / Jeff Khoury vs Renee Shephard / Jeff Peatrowsky6-3, 6-3
2025-06-29vs The Nelson/Harner X7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber Playle / Jeff Khoury vs Kaitlyn Scott / Matt Vittitow1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKara Jenkins / Russell Roberts vs Heidi Moore / Joe Johnson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSabrina Greene / Kyle Minton vs Jacie Vittitow / Stephen James4-6, 2-6
2025-06-22vs Garland/Lv X7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesRaj Sidhu / Amber Playle vs Chihwei Wang / Linda Chin6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLance Christian / Kara Jenkins vs Wei-Bin Lai / Aesun Park0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Payne / Elaine Payne vs Yaoqi Guo / Tao Kang0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-15vs Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Fritz / Raj Sidhu vs Kathryn Dehmer / Sean Smith6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKilvia Edwards / Lance Christian vs Elizabeth Welch / Niven Padachy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSabrina Greene / Russell Roberts vs Allison Waldron / Chad Waldron1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · X7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garland/Nguyen X7.0601626115
2Oak Creek/Coates X7.051162588
3Fretz/Livengood X7.05114413140
4Garland/Lv X7.05113515141
5The Nelson/Harner X7.04213515135
6Oak Creek/Christian X7.0339920180
7Bent Tree/Sarche X7.03381022173
8Fretz/Conwill X7.03361225178
9McKinney/Hong X7.02481023176
10High Point/Kurinji X7.02461224181
11Greenhill/Sanders-Madden X7.01551327182
12Canyon Creek/Jost X7.01551327186
13Chandlers Landing/Meacham X7.01541429194
14Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.01531533208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Terence Whitaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Elaine Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Brent Barrow
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.08
Amanda Fritz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Sabrina Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Amber Playle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Laura Barrow
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Jeff Khoury
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kara Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kilvia Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Minton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lance Christian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Raj Sidhu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Russell Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Barrow + Laura Barrow3346% gamesnot enough data
Raj Sidhu + Amber Playle404 matchesnot enough data
Terence Whitaker + Amanda Fritz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terence Whitaker
18W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Elaine Payne
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brent Barrow
32W–28L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3
Amanda Fritz
18W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
Sabrina Greene
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Amber Playle
10W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Laura Barrow
32W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.88
Jeff Khoury
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Jenkins
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kilvia Edwards
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Minton
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lance Christian
23W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raj Sidhu
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Roberts
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.