Teams

Fireball!

2023 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-17vs GOATSWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wilson / Julie McDonald vs Doenie Jones / Cathy Drake1-0
2023-05-03vs HCC AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Raeber / Julie McDonald vs Vicki Flume / Roxy Therrien6-1, 6-3
2023-04-30vs Nothing but LoveWon 10
W#1 SinglesJulie McDonald vs Christina Floyd6-2, 7-6
2023-04-19vs Chick KickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wilson / Julie McDonald vs ADRA KIPPER / Jill Yost6-0, 6-1
2023-04-12vs Alley KatsWon 10
W#1 SinglesJulie McDonald vs Rebecca Franson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fireball!131461025358
2Each Hit131451132384
3Honey Deuce122461027372
4Nothing but Love122371946432
5HCC Aces104391745443
6Net Party86302659476
7YOURS!68243269516
8GOATS68263069533
9Volley Llamas68243270518
10Party at the net68243271547
11Rip City59233371544
12Alley Kats59213575553
13Net-Chix212114592606
14Chick Kickers113124493616
15Shenanigans014124492615

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tanya Vaughan
published 4
3.52
3.42
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Strong
published 3.5
3.38
Molly Otter
published 3.5
3.25
Betsy McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.20
Cynthia Copple
published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Jennifer Wilson
published
Elba Massena
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Glory Questad
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Julie McDonald
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kara Taggart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lauren Noonan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Melissa Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Molly Mosher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Nancy Raeber
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Vaughan + Jennifer Wilson2643% games+0.2% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Jennifer Wilson3444% games−1.0% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Stacey Strong10850% games−3.1% vs expected
Sondra Power-Thornton + Tanya Vaughan181350% games−3.7% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Sondra Power-Thornton12459% games−4.3% vs expected
Lauren Noonan + Molly Otter261851% gamesnot enough data
Betsy McDonald + Melissa Nielsen15753% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Copple + Nancy Raeber10656% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanya Vaughan
148W–143L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Stacey Strong
64W–62L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Molly Otter
133W–74L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Betsy McDonald
52W–23L career · 11 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia Copple
74W–96L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Jennifer Johnson
28W–32L career · 12 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.93
Elba Massena
14W–14L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Glory Questad
43W–59L career · 13 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie McDonald
18W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Taggart
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Noonan
48W–39L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Nielsen
21W–8L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Mosher
29W–16L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Raeber
22W–8L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.