Teams

GOATS

2023 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

19 players · average NTRP 3.21 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-17vs Fireball!Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDoenie Jones / Cathy Drake vs Jennifer Wilson / Julie McDonald0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzie Wilson / Amy Salerno vs Jennifer Johnson / Stacey Strong2-6, 5-7
2023-05-15vs HCC AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzie Wilson / Amy Salerno vs Vicki Goss / Kimberly Shansby5-7, 2-6
2023-05-10vs YOURS!Split 11
L#1 DoublesDoenie Jones / Farrell Kessler vs Fariss Mcgee / Maggie Horvat5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSuzie Wilson / Amy Salerno vs Leah Hart / Angel Marie Bowie6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-08vs Volley LlamasWon 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Drake / Amy Salerno vs Rosa Carnot / Sandra Gulley6-4, 6-3
2023-05-03vs Nothing but LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesDoenie Jones / Stacey Novak vs Rebecca Clift-French / Christina Floyd1-6, 3-6
2023-05-01vs Chick KickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDoenie Jones / Connie Johnston vs ADRA KIPPER / Jill Yost6-4, 6-4
2023-04-26vs Party at the netWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Costello / Doenie Jones vs Eva VanCuren / Gini Rosandick6-2, 7-6
2023-04-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesSuzie Wilson / Amy Salerno vs Kim Agler / Stephanie Churchman6-2, 6-2
2023-04-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Salerno / Suzie Wilson vs Rachel Boren / Mardianne Howell0-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fireball!131461025358
2Each Hit131451132384
3Honey Deuce122461027372
4Nothing but Love122371946432
5HCC Aces104391745443
6Net Party86302659476
7YOURS!68243269516
8GOATS68263069533
9Volley Llamas68243270518
10Party at the net68243271547
11Rip City59233371544
12Alley Kats59213575553
13Net-Chix212114592606
14Chick Kickers113124493616
15Shenanigans014124492615

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Andrea Lambe
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.23
Dawn Collias
published 3.5
3.22
Eileen Ursillo
published 3.5
3.12
Farrell Kessler
published 3
3.11
Amy Costello
published 3.5
3.02
Suzie Wilson
published
2.96
Daphne McNeal
published 3
2.95
Amy Salerno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Stacey Novak
published 3
2.90
Nikki Reynolds
published 3
2.89
Laurie Nowierski
published 3
2.81
Cindy Haroian
published 3
2.78
Cathy Drake
published 3
2.72
Sheila Hennessey
published 3
2.67
Emily Beckmann
published 3
Doenie Jones
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jacqueline Lawley
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Jill Mckinney
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Terri Schwanz
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daphne McNeal + Nikki Reynolds7167% games+5.4% vs expected
Nikki Reynolds + Farrell Kessler4546% games+4.2% vs expected
Suzie Wilson + Cindy Haroian4942% games−1.6% vs expected
Farrell Kessler + Jacqueline Lawley16858% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Nowierski + Cathy Drake14661% gamesnot enough data
Daphne McNeal + Jill Mckinney16259% gamesnot enough data
Suzie Wilson + Amy Salerno41242% gamesnot enough data
Emily Beckmann + Jacqueline Lawley8652% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · 11 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Dawn Collias
52W–63L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Eileen Ursillo
133W–146L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Farrell Kessler
106W–81L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Amy Costello
147W–95L career · type A · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Suzie Wilson
81W–178L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.02
3
Daphne McNeal
53W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3.5
Amy Salerno
10W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Stacey Novak
88W–110L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Nikki Reynolds
74W–67L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Laurie Nowierski
65W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Cindy Haroian
76W–100L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cathy Drake
57W–54L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Sheila Hennessey
28W–40L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Emily Beckmann
62W–53L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Doenie Jones
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jacqueline Lawley
50W–38L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Mckinney
50W–37L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Schwanz
3W–6L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.