Teams

Honey Deuce

2023 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.59 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-10vs Nothing but LoveWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracie Munds / Jennifer Sukow vs Rebecca Clift-French / Kathleen Forrest6-1, 7-6
2023-05-01vs Alley KatsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Ewing / Tracie Munds vs Lynda Brown / Sabrina Stokes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-26vs Rip CityWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracie Munds / Jennifer Sukow vs Allison Rohnert / Gillian Donahey6-2, 7-5
2023-04-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren East / Tracie Munds vs Daphne McNeal / Amy Costello6-0, 6-0
2023-04-05vs Net-ChixWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristin Mumford / Tracie Munds vs Monica Opp / Jody Orr6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fireball!131461025358
2Each Hit131451132384
3Honey Deuce122461027372
4Nothing but Love122371946432
5HCC Aces104391745443
6Net Party86302659476
7YOURS!68243269516
8GOATS68263069533
9Volley Llamas68243270518
10Party at the net68243271547
11Rip City59233371544
12Alley Kats59213575553
13Net-Chix212114592606
14Chick Kickers113124493616
15Shenanigans014124492615

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Karen East
published 4
3.57
Heidi Stipp
published 4
3.38
Jennifer Sukow
published 3.5
3.37
Deniz Aygen
published 3.5
3.31
Erin Kohler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.24
Terri Mulcahy
published 3.5
3.19
Christy Siemons
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.18
Dana Rusin
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristin Mumford
published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Beagles
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Kate MacKay
usually #1 Singles 91%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published
Tamara Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Tracie Munds
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Kohler + Jennifer Sukow121652% games+15.6% vs expected
Deniz Aygen + Karen East6462% games+6.5% vs expected
Dana Rusin + Terri Mulcahy10255% games−1.1% vs expected
Dana Rusin + Jennifer Sukow6646% games−9.4% vs expected
Deniz Aygen + Terri Mulcahy1532% games−17.9% vs expected
Barbara Beagles + Heidi Stipp241057% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Stipp + Dana Rusin20266% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Terri Mulcahy12856% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen East
144W–86L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Heidi Stipp
166W–109L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jennifer Sukow
144W–145L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Deniz Aygen
149W–60L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Kohler
155W–119L career · 16 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Terri Mulcahy
84W–51L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Christy Siemons
78W–79L career · 13 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dana Rusin
88W–106L career · 13 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kristin Mumford
134W–81L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Beagles
77W–75L career · 16 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
Kate MacKay
66W–22L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tamara Clayton
48W–26L career · 13 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracie Munds
56W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.