Teams

Shenanigans

2023 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-05-18vs YOURS!Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Cannon / Wendy Lahmon vs Kelly Haskell / Cindy Tuck4-6, 4-6
2023-05-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Molly Schafer1-6, 1-6
2023-05-10vs HCC AcesLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Kimberly Shansby2-6, 2-6
2023-05-03vs Volley LlamasLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Linda Bloomer0-6, 3-6
2023-05-01vs Nothing but LoveLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Christina Floyd1-6, 2-6
2023-04-17Split 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Friend / Wendy Lahmon vs Amy Boettcher / Liz Crookston6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Andrea Reynolds1-6, 0-6
2023-04-13vs Alley KatsLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Lynda Brown1-6, 1-6
2023-04-12vs Net PartySplit 11
W#2 DoublesChristine Cannon / Wendy Lahmon vs Amanda Steele / Marie Parker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Hickok / Jill Sulgrove vs Loria Sylvia / Diane Cercle1-6, 1-6
2023-04-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Sulgrove / Heidi Friend vs Barbara Beagles / Lori Ewing1-6, 3-6
2023-04-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Sulgrove vs Nancy Mallory2-6, 0-6
2023-04-03Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Lahmon / Christine Cannon vs Terri Schwanz / Connie Johnston4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Sulgrove / Robin Toney vs Farrell Kessler / Cindy Haroian0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fireball!131461025358
2Each Hit131451132384
3Honey Deuce122461027372
4Nothing but Love122371946432
5HCC Aces104391745443
6Net Party86302659476
7YOURS!68243269516
8GOATS68263069533
9Volley Llamas68243270518
10Party at the net68243271547
11Rip City59233371544
12Alley Kats59213575553
13Net-Chix212114592606
14Chick Kickers113124493616
15Shenanigans014124492615

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Gracie Franks
published 3.5
3.03
KATIE RATLIFF
published 3
2.85
Kim Roth
published 3
2.71
Heidi Friend
published 3
2.70
Suzanne Hickok
published 3
2.70
Christine Cannon
published 3
2.63
Erin Retelle
published 3
Jill Sulgrove
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Karen Sheehan
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Robin Toney
usually #1 Doubles 74%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Wendy Lahmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Friend + Suzanne Hickok1538% games+0.8% vs expected
Suzanne Hickok + Erin Retelle111948% games−1.3% vs expected
Robin Toney + Gracie Franks485050% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Friend + Karen Sheehan203642% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Robin Toney2837% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Wendy Lahmon2842% gamesnot enough data
KATIE RATLIFF + Robin Toney4444% gamesnot enough data
Karen Sheehan + Suzanne Hickok2437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gracie Franks
74W–90L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
KATIE RATLIFF
127W–121L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Kim Roth
41W–51L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Heidi Friend
101W–130L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Suzanne Hickok
75W–124L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Christine Cannon
82W–136L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Erin Retelle
64W–112L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jill Sulgrove
0W–10L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Sheehan
34W–43L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Toney
38W–48L career · 19 lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Lahmon
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.