Teams

The Quarry - Shinnick

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Candace Azad vs Fiona Prentice / Barclay Marcell3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Rainey / Karey Hogan vs Audrey Berish / Rosie Renfro3-6, 1-6
2025-02-17vs World Tennis Club / CalkinsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllyson Schillinger / Candace Azad vs Vesna Petrovic / Gwendolyn Messonnier5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGreta Beatty / Karey Hogan vs Michele May / Julia Lutz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Brenda Shields vs Mercedes Calkins / Daniela Krskova4-6, 3-6
2025-02-10vs Vineyards / KennaughWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Minde Shinnick vs Alicia Kennaugh / Cari Shaw6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Brenda Shields vs Susan Feldman / Debra Bowenkamp1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / Greta Beatty vs Emily Buckman / Mary McCarthy6-3, 6-2
2025-02-03vs Pelican Landing / SeefeldWon 21
L#1 DoublesGreta Beatty / Carla Klumpp vs Sue Kitchen / Kimberly Ricchio6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Catherine Rigamer vs Jodi Petkovich / Deborah Washburn6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / Beth Rainey vs Ann Soper / Patricia Gladstone6-3, 6-4
2025-01-27vs Pelican Bay North / P. StrakoschLost 12
L#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Greta Beatty vs Susan Odonnell / Kelley Lindes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Carla Klumpp vs Joanne Belcastro / Beth Jones1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / Beth Rainey vs Christina Zajac / Lisbeth Wilson6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKarey Hogan / Greta Beatty vs Fiona Prentice / Barclay Marcell0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Thurston / Beth Rainey vs Helena Roeper / Biqin Teng6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Lori Coates vs Patricia Kelly / Linda Michaux4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-13vs Grey Oaks / WerchekLost 12
L#1 DoublesGreta Beatty / Minde Shinnick vs Karyn Sardar / Lisa McGillis1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKarey Hogan / Carla Klumpp vs Peggy Hogan / Anne Marie Russell1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Brenda Shields vs Veronica Howell / Nancy Harbert4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-06vs Pelican Bay South / LabriolaWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Rainey / Catherine Rigamer vs Susan Labriola / Laura Contri3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKarey Hogan / Carla Klumpp vs Marie France McCloskey / Laura Groark4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Greta Beatty vs Lisa Silva / Mary Butler6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Minde Shinnick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Catherine Rigamer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Greta Beatty
published
3.75
Karey Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.67
Carla Klumpp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Karen Hole
published 4
3.56
Candace Azad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Kathy Thurston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.33
Allyson Schillinger
published 3.5
3.33
Tina Albright
published
Brenda Shields
published 3.5
Lori Coates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minde Shinnick + Lori Coates312552% games+0.2% vs expected
Minde Shinnick + Karey Hogan4943% gamesnot enough data
Candace Azad + Karen Hole3446% gamesnot enough data
Carla Klumpp + Karey Hogan3355% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Greta Beatty2447% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Greta Beatty314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minde Shinnick
119W–115L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Catherine Rigamer
75W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Greta Beatty
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Karey Hogan
91W–110L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Carla Klumpp
99W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Candace Azad
132W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
4
Kathy Thurston
77W–103L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Beth Rainey
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Allyson Schillinger
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Tina Albright
17W–40L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Brenda Shields
23W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.