Teams

Grey Oaks / Werchek

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-24vs Pelican Bay South / LabriolaLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Werchek / Lisa McGillis vs Marylu Kosiarek / Marsha Norris3-6, 2-6
2025-02-17vs Pelican Landing / SeefeldSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeggy Hogan / Veronica Howell vs Carol Polipnick / Sue Kitchen3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Morand / Susan Aldrich vs Cynthia Emhardt / Ann Soper6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Morand / Susan Aldrich vs Fiona Prentice / Stacey Mondragon3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Harbert / Karyn Sardar vs Rosie Renfro / Audrey Berish4-6, 5-7
2025-02-03vs Pelican Bay South / LabriolaWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Morand / Susan Aldrich vs Susan Labriola / Beverly Biltz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeggy Hogan / Nancy Harbert vs Mary Butler / Laura Groark4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargaret Werchek / Veronica Howell vs Tami Turner / Lisa Silva1-6, 6-7
2025-01-27vs Vineyards / KennaughSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Morand / Susan Aldrich vs Debra Bowenkamp / Mary Stuart Snyder6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristine Miller / Bernadette Devoe vs Emily Buckman / Mary McCarthy5-7, 2-6
2025-01-20vs Pelican Bay North / P. StrakoschSplit 11
L#2 DoublesVeronica Howell / Bernadette Devoe vs Peggy Strakosch / Lisbeth Wilson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa McGillis / Nancy Harbert vs Lisa Ruffolo / Christina Zajac6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-13vs The Quarry - ShinnickLost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Howell / Nancy Harbert vs Catherine Rigamer / Brenda Shields6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-07vs World Tennis Club / CalkinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesVeronica Howell / Nancy Harbert - * vs Vesna Petrovic / Linda Poston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Marie Russell / Kristine Miller vs Tracy Lockton / Daniela Krskova6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Karen Morand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
3.67
Cindy McDonough
published 4
3.27
Bernadette Devoe
published 3.5
Joan Stolberg
published
Karyn Sardar
published
Kristine Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa McGillis
published
Margaret Werchek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Harbert
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Peggy Hogan
published
Susan Aldrich
published
Susan Caskey
published
Veronica Howell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Harbert + Veronica Howell9754% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Harbert + Karyn Sardar9162% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Werchek + Veronica Howell5254% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Hogan + Susan Caskey303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Caskey + Lisa McGillis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Morand
65W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Anne Marie Russell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Cindy McDonough
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Bernadette Devoe
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Joan Stolberg
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karyn Sardar
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Miller
55W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa McGillis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Werchek
55W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Harbert
148W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Hogan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Aldrich
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Caskey
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Howell
42W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.