Teams

Vineyards / Kennaugh

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-03vs Pelican Landing / SeefeldLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Stuart Snyder / Kathleen Iverson vs Rebecca Matarazzi / Tracy Halvin6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-17vs Pelican Bay South / LabriolaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlicia Kennaugh / Cari Shaw vs Laura Contri / Marsha Norris2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Mary McCarthy vs Marie France McCloskey / Marian Jacobson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-10vs The Quarry - ShinnickWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Kennaugh / Cari Shaw vs Catherine Rigamer / Minde Shinnick4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-03vs Pelican Bay North / P. StrakoschLost 02
L#1 DoublesCari Shaw / Alicia Kennaugh vs Lisa Ruffolo / Peggy Strakosch1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Susan Feldman vs Debra Bowman / Lisbeth Wilson5-7, 4-6
2025-01-27vs Grey Oaks / WerchekLost 01
L#1 DoublesCari Shaw / Kathleen Iverson vs Anne Marie Russell / Peggy Hogan3-6, 1-6
2025-01-20vs World Tennis Club / CalkinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Carol Halliday vs Daniela Krskova / Linda Wojtasinski7-6, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Pelican Landing / SeefeldLost 02
L#2 DoublesCari Shaw / Susan Feldman vs Jennifer Seefeld / Kimberly Ricchio1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary McCarthy / Kathleen Iverson vs Carol Polipnick / Catherine Prosia5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMercedes Baumann / Kathleen Iverson vs Linda Michaux / Biqin Teng6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annette Brennan
published 4
3.71
Carol Halliday
published 4
3.69
Alicia Kennaugh
published 4
3.68
Emily Buckman
published
3.58
Cari Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.38
Mercedes Baumann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Kathleen Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Mary Stuart Snyder
published
Susan Feldman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Iverson + Mercedes Baumann134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annette Brennan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Carol Halliday
69W–41L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Alicia Kennaugh
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Emily Buckman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Cari Shaw
28W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Mercedes Baumann
76W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Kathleen Iverson
50W–73L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Mary Stuart Snyder
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Feldman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.