Teams

World Tennis Club / Calkins

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-27vs Pelican Bay North / P. StrakoschLost 01
L#1 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Peggy Strakosch / Susan Odonnell2-6, 2-6
2025-02-17vs The Quarry - ShinnickWon 20
W#1 DoublesVesna Petrovic / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Allyson Schillinger / Candace Azad7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Daniela Krskova vs Catherine Rigamer / Brenda Shields6-4, 6-3
2025-02-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Mercedes Calkins vs Deborah Washburn / Catherine Ross6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Daniela Krskova vs Helena Roeper / Patricia Kelly7-6, 7-5
2025-01-27vs Pelican Bay South / LabriolaLost 01
L#3 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Laura Groark / Amy Enxing3-6, 0-6
2025-01-20vs Vineyards / KennaughWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebora Attalla / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Debra Bowenkamp / Mary Stuart Snyder2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-07vs Grey Oaks / WerchekLost 01
L#1 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Debora Attalla vs Lisa McGillis / Karyn Sardar3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
3.69
Tracy Lockton
published
3.59
Gwendolyn Messonnier
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.36
Linda Wojtasinski
published
3.17
Julia Lutz
published
Mercedes Calkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michele May
published
Vesna Petrovic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mercedes Calkins + Gwendolyn Messonnier3444% gamesnot enough data
Mercedes Calkins + Elizabeth Lawnicki123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Lawnicki
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Tracy Lockton
99W–49L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gwendolyn Messonnier
133W–140L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Linda Wojtasinski
8W–23L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.36
Julia Lutz
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Mercedes Calkins
62W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele May
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vesna Petrovic
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.