Teams

Chastain (Amber Rogers)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesSarah Matthews / Caroline Creagh vs Che Moore / Annie Nayak2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesXumin Cai vs Kelly Cepeda0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOlivia Smith / Summer Xue vs Rickelle Lewis / Mallory Mark2-6, 0-6
2025-12-13vs Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKennon Doughtie / Olivia Smith vs Kasey Ghomghani / Jessica Etzkorn0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Creagh / Sarah Matthews vs Carly Smith / Jennifer Duncan1-6, 0-6
2025-12-06vs Sandy Springs RC (Abby Kelley)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmber Rogers / Alexandra Guidry vs Brenda Estrada / Lilly Goldfarb6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesOlivia Smith / Candace Sapp vs Elizabeth Murray / Cristina Young6-3, 4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesAmber Rogers / Alexandra Guidry vs Erica Cozewith / Faith Cordell6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesXumin Cai vs Alyssa Knickerbocker1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Matthews / Olivia Smith vs Jessica Smith / Nicole Ciccarello2-6, 1-6
2025-11-15vs Piedmont Park (Taylor Younginer)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Guidry / Summer Xue vs Kelsey Paul Emory / Taylor Younginer6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesXumin Cai vs Rachel Paganelli5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Alexandra Guidry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Amber Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Candace Sapp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Caroline Creagh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.94
Xumin Cai
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.81
Sarah Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kennon Doughtie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Smith
published
Summer Xue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Guidry + Amber Rogers5082% games+23.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandra Guidry
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Amber Rogers
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Candace Sapp
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Caroline Creagh
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Xumin Cai
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Sarah Matthews
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Kennon Doughtie
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Smith
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Summer Xue
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.