Teams

McGhee TC (Markeela Tyson)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-10vs South Fulton (Kim Gruber)*Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKendra Gill vs Ryleigh Harris6-2, 3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRenita Whitfield / Mackenzie Sloan vs Shelley Leonta / Joy Taylor4-6, 2-6
2025-12-13vs Washington Park (Kalen Axam)*Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSafae Hammer / Renita Whitfield vs Keturah Orji / Olasumbo Ogunsola3-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs Tributary (Angela Knight)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Sengoba / Tammy Soyoye vs LaDonna Jordan / Tina Wilson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMarkeela Tyson vs Emily Najar1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanni Dong / Safae Hammer vs Angela Knight / Larissa Hendley2-6, 4-6
2025-11-22vs South Fulton (Kim Gruber)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Ordonez / Shanice Smith vs Ryleigh Harris / Sherri Hudson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Sengoba / Danielle DePiano vs Kim Gruber / Courtney Mitchell1-6, 0-6
2025-11-15vs Washington Park (Kalen Axam)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSafae Hammer / Shanice Smith vs Kelsey Darden / Angela Cain4-6, 6-4, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKendra Gill vs Kalen Axam6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Soyoye / Rita Garrett vs Erika Hines / Latonya Jones-gray1-6, 4-6
2025-11-08vs Tributary (Angela Knight)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Barnes / Markeela Tyson vs Tina Benoit / Tina Wilson6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKendra Gill vs Angela Knight6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Kendra Gill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Danielle DePiano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Danni Dong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.99
Markeela Tyson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.88
Safae Hammer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ana Ordonez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Sengoba
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Renita Whitfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rita Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shanice Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tammy Soyoye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendra Gill
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Danielle DePiano
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Danni Dong
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Markeela Tyson
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Safae Hammer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Ana Ordonez
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Sengoba
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renita Whitfield
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rita Garrett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shanice Smith
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tammy Soyoye
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.