Teams

Piedmont Park (Taylor Younginer)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesVanessa Toro / Taylor Harris vs Olivia Johnson / Kandis Anderson-Grant6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShermaine Waugh vs Nida Ahmed6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmma Bunicci / Joviane Leandre vs Dansowaa Ahima / Kadia Brown6-4, 6-1
2026-01-11vs Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesShermaine Waugh / Taylor Younginer vs Kitae Kim / Jessica Etzkorn6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Bunicci vs Starr McClinton6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVanessa Toro / Rachel Paganelli vs Greer Gorman / Jennifer Duncan6-4, 4-6, 7-5
2025-12-13vs Sandy Springs RC (Abby Kelley)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesJoviane Leandre / Sarah Burkeen vs Brenda Estrada / Abby Kelley6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShermaine Waugh vs Elizabeth Murray6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSarah Burkeen / Emma Bunicci vs Ashley Brammer / Rachael Otis6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesShermaine Waugh vs Shasha Bai3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJoviane Leandre / Adaora Ubosi vs Taylor Lindner / Katie Hamilton6-3, 4-6, 5-7
2025-11-15vs Chastain (Amber Rogers)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelsey Paul Emory / Taylor Younginer vs Alexandra Guidry / Summer Xue2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Paganelli vs Xumin Cai7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKelsey Paul Emory / Adaora Ubosi vs Annie Nayak / Mallory Mark5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoviane Leandre / Vanessa Toro vs Rickelle Lewis / Rebecca Hemperley6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Emma Bunicci
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.45
Shermaine Waugh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.32
Taylor Younginer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Joviane Leandre
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Adaora Ubosi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Sarah Burkeen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Vanessa Toro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kelsey Paul Emory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Paganelli
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Taylor Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Bunicci
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Shermaine Waugh
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Taylor Younginer
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Joviane Leandre
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Adaora Ubosi
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Burkeen
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Vanessa Toro
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Kelsey Paul Emory
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Paganelli
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Harris
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.