Teams

ITP Training Academy (Kandis Anderson-Grant)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-17vs Piedmont Park (Taylor Younginer)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesOlivia Johnson / Kandis Anderson-Grant vs Vanessa Toro / Taylor Harris2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNida Ahmed vs Shermaine Waugh1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDansowaa Ahima / Kadia Brown vs Emma Bunicci / Joviane Leandre4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesHannah Clifford / Martha Burns vs Rebecca Hemperley / Rickelle Lewis4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKadia Brown vs Kelly Cepeda0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDansowaa Ahima / Olivia Johnson vs Annie Nayak / Mallory Mark2-6, 2-6
2025-11-15vs Sandy Springs RC (Abby Kelley)*Split 11
L#1 SinglesDansowaa Ahima vs Elizabeth Murray3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNida Ahmed / Kadia Brown vs Adrienne Hoyt / Jessica Divita6-0, 6-1
2025-11-15vs Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKandis Anderson-Grant / Olivia Johnson vs Greer Gorman / Jennifer Duncan2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNida Ahmed vs Lorna Gitari7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMartha Burns / Imani Sinclair vs Kasey Ghomghani / Carly Smith2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKandis Anderson-Grant / Nida Ahmed vs Ashley Brammer / Rachael Otis2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMengyi Rajchel vs Alyssa Knickerbocker6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKadia Brown / Imani Sinclair vs Erica Cozewith / Faith Cordell6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 2.5 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.24
Kadia Brown
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.10
Alexandria Edwards
published 2.5
1.96
Dansowaa Ahima
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.95
Kandis Anderson-Grant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.84
Martha Burns
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.84
Nida Ahmed
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.73
Imani Sinclair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Mengyi Rajchel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Silvana Gutierrez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kandis Anderson-Grant + Alexandria Edwards134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kadia Brown
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Alexandria Edwards
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Dansowaa Ahima
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Kandis Anderson-Grant
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Martha Burns
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Nida Ahmed
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
2.5
Imani Sinclair
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.73
Mengyi Rajchel
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Silvana Gutierrez
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.