Teams

X18 7.0 LT Garst

2023 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring

26 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-28vs X18 7.0 PM RappWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlissa McKenzie / Mitch Crawford vs Alice Lewis / Jerry Kozik7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristina Reeves / Michael Kramer vs Debbie Liebler / John Liebler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Shockey / Vish Chandran vs Mona Davis / Tim McQuown2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-14vs X18 7.0 TP FoxWon 21
L#1 DoublesRyan Garst / Rebekka Hom vs Jamie Fox / Brian Lambright4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMitch Crawford / Jill Diamond vs Andrew Leffler / Robin Rohrig7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHannah Banas / Ryoichi Fujiwara vs Vince Cheverine / Michelle Fox6-2, 6-1
2023-03-31vs X18 7.0 NC JohnstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlissa McKenzie / Collin Burick vs Kimberly Williams / Michael Williams6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMitch Crawford / Heather Wentz vs Rex Degler / Patricia Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRyoichi Fujiwara / Hannah Banas vs Lora Kilkenny / Daren Rosenberger6-2, 6-2
2023-03-26vs X18 7.0 TP FoxLost 03
L#1 DoublesVish Chandran / Lindsay Sirak vs Brian Lambright / Shelby Schaffner6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Sterling / Heather Wentz vs Brendan Ho / Robin Rohrig7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMitch Crawford / Christina Reeves vs Steve Barker / Erin Gray6-7, 4-6
2023-03-17vs X18 7.0 CC DixonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCollin Burick / Christa Galehouse vs SURENDER VELUSAMY / Jodi Geduldig1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Garst / Kristin Lenton vs Amanda Farrell / Robert Farrell3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Diamond / Mitch Crawford vs Sriram Krishnan / Cheryl Chase5-7, 4-6
2023-03-10vs X18 7.0 PM RappWon 21
W#1 DoublesChrista Galehouse / Michael Kramer vs Joe Swiatkowski / Mona Davis2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRob Rericha / Tracy Mathia vs Andy Brouse / Jill Lengel0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVish Chandran / Jessica Shockey vs Mark Whitlam / Bonita Teeuwen6-2, 6-2
2023-02-24vs X18 7.0 NC JohnstonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Suddeth / Christa Galehouse vs Kimberly Williams / Michael Williams6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Lenton / Collin Burick vs Ashley Bullach / Matthew Johnston6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ruggles / Scott Hovey vs Rex Degler / Patricia Johnson3-6, 1-6
2023-02-03vs X18 7.0 CC DixonWon 21
L#1 DoublesRyoichi Fujiwara / Jessica Shockey vs Murphy Dickason / Melissa Meisenbach6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMabruk Quabili / Yasmine Quabili vs Deborah Rachek / Hangyu Choi6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRyan Garst / Rebekka Hom vs Venkatraman Arakoni / Alamelu Arakoni4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 7.0 PW Mikolich73181229251
2X18 7.0 MV1 Gustafson73191131272
3X18 7.0 NC Johnston6216816165
4X18 7.0 CSC Dray64191131281
5X18 7.0 MV2 Nine64191132278
6X18 7.0 LT Garst53111330228
7X18 7.0 CC Dixon44131125201
8X18 7.0 MV3 Zhang46111945308
9X18 7.0 PM Rapp35111331231
10X18 7.0 TP Fox2691533244
11X18 7.0 WR Roberts01042655338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mabruk Quabili
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Vish Chandran
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Yasmine Quabili
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Brian Suddeth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Rebekka Hom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Jill Diamond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Christina Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Mitch Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Collin Burick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
William Kenyhercz
published
3.25
Jennifer Ruggles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Kristin Lenton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Ryan Garst
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Scott Hovey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Christa Galehouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Heather Wentz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Tracy Mathia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jeff Sterling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Alissa McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Rob Rericha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Jessica Shockey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Lindsay Sirak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hannah Banas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Anne Lubinski
published 3
Michael Kramer
published
Ryoichi Fujiwara
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alissa McKenzie + Ryoichi Fujiwara8167% games+17.3% vs expected
Lindsay Sirak + Ryoichi Fujiwara4357% games+6.1% vs expected
Alissa McKenzie + Ryan Garst2351% games+2.9% vs expected
Rob Rericha + Jennifer Ruggles3249% games+0.2% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Christina Reeves4351% games−3.0% vs expected
Christa Galehouse + Ryoichi Fujiwara4258% gamesnot enough data
Yasmine Quabili + Mabruk Quabili4254% gamesnot enough data
Mitch Crawford + Jill Diamond4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mabruk Quabili
88W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Vish Chandran
34W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Yasmine Quabili
83W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Brian Suddeth
70W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Rebekka Hom
89W–56L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
Jill Diamond
130W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Christina Reeves
112W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Mitch Crawford
58W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Collin Burick
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
William Kenyhercz
25W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Jennifer Ruggles
140W–84L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Kristin Lenton
77W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Ryan Garst
129W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Scott Hovey
40W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.17
3.5
Christa Galehouse
178W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Heather Wentz
95W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Tracy Mathia
88W–63L career · 1 line in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jeff Sterling
76W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Alissa McKenzie
142W–123L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Rob Rericha
45W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Jessica Shockey
44W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Lindsay Sirak
57W–44L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Hannah Banas
41W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Anne Lubinski
48W–33L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Michael Kramer
92W–58L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryoichi Fujiwara
109W–34L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.