Teams

X18 7.0 CC Dixon

2023 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring

20 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-14vs X18 7.0 PM RappWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Farrell / Robert Farrell vs Jill Lengel / David Hunt6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Rachek / Samuel Samuel vs Sally Rapp / Christopher Bolish1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVenkatraman Arakoni / Cheryl Chase vs Jerry Kozik / Susan Whitlam6-2, 6-2
2023-04-01vs X18 7.0 TP FoxLost 03
L#1 DoublesSriram Krishnan / Jodi Geduldig vs Cora Shane / Ron Novak5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVictoria Kuczynski / Kevin Kuczynski vs Erin Gray / Michael Terapane2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVenkatraman Arakoni / Alamelu Arakoni vs Brendan Ho / Lisa Consilio6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-25vs X18 7.0 NC JohnstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarcie Hansen / Hangyu Choi vs Kimberly Williams / Michael Williams2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlamelu Arakoni / Samuel Samuel vs Jaimie Crumbley / Clayton Cundiff4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Miller / Pramod Padmanabhan vs Matthew Johnston / Ashley Bullach6-0, 6-2
2023-03-17vs X18 7.0 LT GarstWon 30
W#1 DoublesSURENDER VELUSAMY / Jodi Geduldig vs Collin Burick / Christa Galehouse6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Farrell / Robert Farrell vs Ryan Garst / Kristin Lenton6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSriram Krishnan / Cheryl Chase vs Jill Diamond / Mitch Crawford7-5, 6-4
2023-03-03vs X18 7.0 PM RappLost 12
L#1 DoublesMurphy Dickason / Melissa Meisenbach vs Marcela Nicolae / Jerry Kozik5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHangyu Choi / Darcie Hansen vs Alice Lewis / Christopher Bolish7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVenkatraman Arakoni / Deborah Rachek vs Diana Lesher / John Liebler5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-24vs X18 7.0 TP FoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Farrell / Amanda Farrell vs William Fox / Jamie Fox6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesVictoria Kuczynski / Kevin Kuczynski vs Steve Barker / Michelle Fox0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHangyu Choi / Darcie Hansen vs Timothy Patterson / Ann Lynch6-0, 6-2
2023-02-10vs X18 7.0 NC JohnstonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Farrell / Amanda Farrell vs Wendi Preston / Daren Rosenberger6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPramod Padmanabhan / Barbara Neilsen vs Patricia Johnson / Timothy Booher6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSURENDER VELUSAMY / Jodi Geduldig vs Michelle Dalton / Jack Dalton6-4, 6-4
2023-02-03vs X18 7.0 LT GarstLost 12
W#1 DoublesMurphy Dickason / Melissa Meisenbach vs Ryoichi Fujiwara / Jessica Shockey6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Rachek / Hangyu Choi vs Mabruk Quabili / Yasmine Quabili2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVenkatraman Arakoni / Alamelu Arakoni vs Ryan Garst / Rebekka Hom6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 7.0 PW Mikolich73181229251
2X18 7.0 MV1 Gustafson73191131272
3X18 7.0 NC Johnston6216816165
4X18 7.0 CSC Dray64191131281
5X18 7.0 MV2 Nine64191132278
6X18 7.0 LT Garst53111330228
7X18 7.0 CC Dixon44131125201
8X18 7.0 MV3 Zhang46111945308
9X18 7.0 PM Rapp35111331231
10X18 7.0 TP Fox2691533244
11X18 7.0 WR Roberts01042655338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Pramod Padmanabhan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Murphy Dickason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Robert Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Venkatraman Arakoni
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.34
Samuel Samuel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jodi Geduldig
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anna Miller
published 3.5
Cheryl Chase
published 3.5
Hangyu Choi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Sriram Krishnan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Deborah Rachek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Barbara Neilsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Alamelu Arakoni
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Darcie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Melissa Meisenbach
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Deanne Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kevin Kuczynski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
SURENDER VELUSAMY
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Victoria Kuczynski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Murphy Dickason + Melissa Meisenbach6358% games+9.4% vs expected
Amanda Farrell + Robert Farrell221751% games+1.5% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Venkatraman Arakoni2742% games−0.4% vs expected
Murphy Dickason + Amanda Farrell044 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Hansen + Hangyu Choi224 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Hansen + Pramod Padmanabhan314 matchesnot enough data
Alamelu Arakoni + Samuel Samuel314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Meisenbach + Robert Farrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pramod Padmanabhan
93W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Murphy Dickason
83W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Robert Farrell
71W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Venkatraman Arakoni
83W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Samuel Samuel
38W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Jodi Geduldig
50W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anna Miller
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Chase
35W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Hangyu Choi
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sriram Krishnan
65W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Deborah Rachek
51W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amanda Farrell
124W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Neilsen
21W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Alamelu Arakoni
134W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
Darcie Hansen
30W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Melissa Meisenbach
140W–114L career · 7 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Deanne Dixon
27W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Kuczynski
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
SURENDER VELUSAMY
56W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Kuczynski
46W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.