Teams

X18 7.0 MV3 Zhang

2023 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-28vs X18 7.0 MV1 GustafsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolann Sterkenburg / Nicholas Fasola vs David Blond / Patricia Mercuri6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYuri Borsch / Susan Kim vs Kristin Chuko / Mark Atkinson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Haught / Janeen Miklowski vs Elyse Gustafson / Cyrus Bazljoo4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-14vs X18 7.0 PW MikolichWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarolann Sterkenburg / Chuck Roman vs Chance Nicklaus / Amanda de Leon4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Aranavage / Nicholas Fasola vs Chris Hensley / Julia Bartram7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Kim / Yuri Borsch vs David Rickard / Diane Blesi6-1, 7-6
2023-03-31vs X18 7.0 WR RobertsWon 21
W#1 DoublesWei Liao / Cheryl Kanetsky vs Steven Parker / Beth Jokhio6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Szymanski / Bob Wiseman vs Brittney Kohanski / Steve Nutt6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYuri Borsch / Lishan Zhang vs Jose Muzzi / Jennifer Brush6-3, 6-3
2023-03-24vs X18 7.0 MV2 NineWon 21
W#1 DoublesJinu Hwang / Denise Hwang vs Craig Nine / Holly Yotter4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolann Sterkenburg / Yuri Borsch vs VIctoria Ung / Andrew Albrecht6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLishan Zhang / Wei Liao vs Lauren Smith / Kevin Stephans4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-17vs X18 7.0 CSC DrayLost 03
L#1 DoublesYuri Borsch / Cheryl Kanetsky vs Kerri Dray / Christopher Lembach2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Haught / Carolann Sterkenburg vs Gustavo Heresi / Kylie Eyre7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRashmi Rao / Bob Wiseman vs Dominique Litmaath / James Dray5-7, 4-6
2023-03-10vs X18 7.0 MV1 GustafsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Aranavage / Robert Haught vs Patricia Mercuri / David Blond6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicholas Fasola / Carolann Sterkenburg vs Pamela Zalba / Cyrus Bazljoo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / John Olenik vs Ken Gustafson / Elyse Gustafson3-6, 6-7
2023-03-03vs X18 7.0 PW MikolichLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Szymanski / John Olenik vs Nicole Mikolich / Jim Mikolich3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Haught / Janeen Miklowski vs Chance Nicklaus / Amanda de Leon6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWei Liao / Lishan Zhang vs Diane Blesi / David Rickard2-6, 4-6
2023-02-24vs X18 7.0 WR RobertsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicholas Fasola / Carolann Sterkenburg vs Christopher Downing / Beth Jokhio4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJinu Hwang / Denise Hwang vs Kathleen Daberko / Jack Mitstifer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Aranavage / John Olenik vs Jose Muzzi / Melissa Durbin7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-10vs X18 7.0 MV2 NineLost 12
L#1 DoublesRashmi Rao / Yuri Borsch vs Andrew Albrecht / VIctoria Ung3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Kanetsky / Wei Liao vs Eileen Connell / Kevin Stephans2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Haught / Janeen Miklowski vs Ben Cutler / Kate Bishop6-3, 6-1
2023-02-03vs X18 7.0 CSC DrayLost 03
L#1 DoublesLishan Zhang / Jinu Hwang vs Kerri Dray / Christopher Lembach4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Kim / Nicholas Fasola vs Daniel Tirrell / Jennifer Gidlow4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarolann Sterkenburg / Yuri Borsch vs James Dray / Blair Kurit2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 7.0 PW Mikolich73181229251
2X18 7.0 MV1 Gustafson73191131272
3X18 7.0 NC Johnston6216816165
4X18 7.0 CSC Dray64191131281
5X18 7.0 MV2 Nine64191132278
6X18 7.0 LT Garst53111330228
7X18 7.0 CC Dixon44131125201
8X18 7.0 MV3 Zhang46111945308
9X18 7.0 PM Rapp35111331231
10X18 7.0 TP Fox2691533244
11X18 7.0 WR Roberts01042655338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Komila Mirolimova
published
3.69
Jinu Hwang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Janeen Miklowski
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.68
Carolann Sterkenburg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Yuri Borsch
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
Robert Haught
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.39
Cheryl Kanetsky
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Nicholas Fasola
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.36
Kathleen Aranavage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Lishan Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Rashmi Rao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Wei Liao
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.21
Emily Szymanski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Chuck Roman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Denise Hwang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bob Wiseman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
John Olenik
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roy Showman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Haught + Lishan Zhang15660% games+11.1% vs expected
Jinu Hwang + Denise Hwang5650% games−0.4% vs expected
Chuck Roman + Kathleen Aranavage4355% gamesnot enough data
Janeen Miklowski + Robert Haught5261% gamesnot enough data
Emily Szymanski + John Olenik224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Kanetsky + Wei Liao134 matchesnot enough data
Carolann Sterkenburg + Yuri Borsch123 matchesnot enough data
Carolann Sterkenburg + Nicholas Fasola213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Komila Mirolimova
56W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
Jinu Hwang
82W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Janeen Miklowski
77W–90L career · 10 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Carolann Sterkenburg
46W–40L career · 12 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Yuri Borsch
109W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.41
Robert Haught
113W–66L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Cheryl Kanetsky
120W–79L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Nicholas Fasola
108W–66L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kathleen Aranavage
147W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lishan Zhang
132W–84L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Rashmi Rao
30W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Wei Liao
67W–74L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Emily Szymanski
92W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Chuck Roman
96W–66L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.13
3
Denise Hwang
82W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Bob Wiseman
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Olenik
64W–63L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roy Showman
37W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.