Teams

X18 7.0 PW Mikolich

2023 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-14vs X18 7.0 MV3 ZhangLost 12
W#1 DoublesChance Nicklaus / Amanda de Leon vs Carolann Sterkenburg / Chuck Roman6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChris Hensley / Julia Bartram vs Kathleen Aranavage / Nicholas Fasola5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Rickard / Diane Blesi vs Susan Kim / Yuri Borsch1-6, 6-7
2023-03-31vs X18 7.0 CSC DrayWon 20
W#1 DoublesNick Karas / Sara Verespej vs Brandon Farley / Stacy Goldberg6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChance Nicklaus / Nicole Mikolich vs Clark Langmack / Jennifer Gidlow6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-24vs X18 7.0 MV1 GustafsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Mikolich / Lacey Hood vs Eric Mock / Xiaozhong Men6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMike Douglas / Megan Kelly vs Davood Dadfar / Donna Fleming6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Rickard / Rachel van Meter vs Bob Berichon / Kristin Chuko5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-17vs X18 7.0 MV2 NineWon 21
W#1 DoublesStuart Scott / Nicole Mikolich vs Craig Nine / Eileen Connell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Mikolich / Julia Bartram vs Kevin Stephans / Kate Bishop7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Rickard / Diane Blesi vs Joseph Stimac / VIctoria Ung5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-10vs X18 7.0 WR RobertsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda de Leon / Jeffrey Barlow vs Dee Balkissoon / Brittney Kohanski6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Hensley / Nicole Mikolich vs Steve Nutt / Arminda Parker6-4, 6-4
2023-03-03vs X18 7.0 MV3 ZhangWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Mikolich / Jim Mikolich vs Emily Szymanski / John Olenik6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChance Nicklaus / Amanda de Leon vs Robert Haught / Janeen Miklowski7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Blesi / David Rickard vs Wei Liao / Lishan Zhang6-2, 6-4
2023-02-24vs X18 7.0 CSC DrayLost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Mikolich / Sara Verespej vs Daniel Tirrell / Kerri Dray6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Hensley / Lacey Hood vs Kylie Eyre / Brandon Farley1-6, 4-6
2023-02-10vs X18 7.0 MV1 GustafsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Hensley / Julia Bartram vs Cyrus Bazljoo / Patricia Mercuri6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Mikolich / Nicole Mikolich vs Ken Gustafson / Elyse Gustafson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Rickard / Diane Blesi vs Bob Berichon / Yulia Lyublinski6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-03vs X18 7.0 MV2 NineWon 21
L#1 DoublesNicole Mikolich / Mike Douglas vs Eileen Connell / Kevin Stephans3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNick Karas / Sara Verespej vs Lynn Roth / Andy Roth6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChance Nicklaus / Amanda de Leon vs Dongmei Zhang / George Raguz4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 7.0 PW Mikolich73181229251
2X18 7.0 MV1 Gustafson73191131272
3X18 7.0 NC Johnston6216816165
4X18 7.0 CSC Dray64191131281
5X18 7.0 MV2 Nine64191132278
6X18 7.0 LT Garst53111330228
7X18 7.0 CC Dixon44131125201
8X18 7.0 MV3 Zhang46111945308
9X18 7.0 PM Rapp35111331231
10X18 7.0 TP Fox2691533244
11X18 7.0 WR Roberts01042655338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
David Rickard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jim Mikolich
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Matthew Horwich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Nick Karas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Nicole Mikolich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.46
Sara Verespej
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Amanda de Leon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Chris Hensley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Julia Bartram
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Rachel van Meter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jeffrey Barlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Diane Blesi
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Chance Nicklaus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lacey Hood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Kelly
published
Mike Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stuart Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Verespej + Jim Mikolich4158% games+2.4% vs expected
Amanda de Leon + David Rickard9555% games+0.4% vs expected
Nicole Mikolich + Jim Mikolich4162% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Mikolich + Stuart Scott2346% gamesnot enough data
Diane Blesi + Matthew Horwich224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Blesi + David Rickard224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel van Meter + David Rickard314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda de Leon + Chance Nicklaus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Rickard
117W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Jim Mikolich
81W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Matthew Horwich
118W–150L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nick Karas
62W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Nicole Mikolich
108W–87L career · 10 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Sara Verespej
97W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Amanda de Leon
79W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Chris Hensley
25W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julia Bartram
115W–125L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Rachel van Meter
102W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jeffrey Barlow
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Diane Blesi
185W–128L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Chance Nicklaus
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lacey Hood
18W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Kelly
36W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Douglas
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stuart Scott
36W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.