Teams

CDTA S A18W4.0 4Tam Wright Fri 7 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

22 players · average NTRP 4.08 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#3 DoublesRebecca Daly / Tanja Boskovic vs Narissa Breger / Monique Melnick2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Berman / Claudia Moscoso-Cordero vs Tracy Meyer / Tina Werber6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Daly / Tanja Boskovic vs Margo Carvell / Youngran Chung2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAllison Goldberg / Crystal Leighton vs Terri Whiting / Terra Jahns6-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Kristy Sweigard vs Lici Lytle / Erica Eisner6-4, 5-2
W#2 SinglesSara Olson vs Barbara Chmieleski6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Berman / Melissa Schopin vs Pam Fisher / Joni Roseri6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJennifer Langtry / Martha Davis vs Dawn Baumann / Elizabeth Burns7-6, 4-3
L#1 SinglesRebecca Daly vs Sofia Velasco1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSara Olson vs Mary Pat Barbarie6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesHuan Chang / Sophia Chang Stauffer vs Christine Munteanu / Cate Le7-5, 4-1
W#1 SinglesSara Olson vs Leah Bian6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAllison Goldberg / Martha Davis vs Illana Hodges / Chandana Namburi1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHuan Chang / Sophia Chang Stauffer vs Jeanine Stathopoulos / Morgan Carr6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRebecca Daly vs Krista Klund6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $2270251024246
2CDTA S A18W4.0 7MT Bann Breger Tue 6:30 $2761221329246
3CDTA S A18W4.0 4Tam Wright Fri 7 $2252221331268
4CDTA S A18W4.0 6Centennial Nemec Thu 7 $2034161943313
5CDTA S A18W4.0 1Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $2234161943318
6CDTA S A18W4.0 2Forest View Chmieleski Thu 7 $2324131736261
7CDTA S A18W4.0 8Glenbrook Meyer Tue 6:30 $2516142143312
8CDTA S A18W4.0 3McFetridge Newson Sat 6 $250672349321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Jennifer Langtry
published 4.5
4.08
Kimberly Horberg
published 4.5
4.08
Crystal Leighton
published 4
4.01
Carrie DeLange
published 4.5
3.98
Huan Chang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Kristy Sweigard
published 4
3.88
Allison Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
3.86
Melissa Schopin
published 4
3.83
Rebecca Kosner
published 4
Ashley Kaufman
published 4
3.75
Sara Olson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.69
Claudia Moscoso-Cordero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
3.66
Michele Berman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Martha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Rebecca Daly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
published 3.5
Jackie Smith
published
Jennifer Peck
published
Jessica Wagner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Davis + Crystal Leighton8075% games+21.1% vs expected
Martha Davis + Allison Goldberg9458% games+13.3% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ashley Kaufman7064% games+10.6% vs expected
Allison Goldberg + Crystal Leighton5360% games+9.8% vs expected
Jennifer Langtry + Crystal Leighton14462% games+7.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Kristy Sweigard9061% games+6.3% vs expected
Martha Davis + Jennifer Langtry25960% games+6.3% vs expected
Martha Davis + Rebecca Daly7260% games+5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jennifer Langtry
244W–109L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Kimberly Horberg
92W–28L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.08
4.5
Carrie DeLange
32W–30L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Huan Chang
178W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Kristy Sweigard
224W–142L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Allison Goldberg
126W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Sophia Chang Stauffer
97W–66L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Melissa Schopin
103W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Rebecca Kosner
96W–53L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ashley Kaufman
43W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Olson
131W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.75
4
Claudia Moscoso-Cordero
48W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Patricia Bustamante
123W–102L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Michele Berman
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Martha Davis
321W–153L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Rebecca Daly
121W–136L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
62W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Smith
54W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Peck
123W–58L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Wagner
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.