Teams

CDTA S A18W4.0 2Forest View Chmieleski Thu 7 $23

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Jessica Wagner1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPam Fisher / Joni Roseri vs Michele Berman / Melissa Schopin4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Stephanie Jund6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMissy Frank / Pam Fisher vs Chandana Namburi / Elise Bergman4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Iva Gregorova7-5, 1-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ligammari / Kitty Swanson vs Rochelle Meng / Leah Starkman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Fisher / Missy Frank vs Jennifer Giertsen / Monique Melnick6-1, 6-4
2025-06-19vs CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $22Lost 04
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Marie Reece2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKitty Swanson / Terra Jahns vs Elizabeth Burns / Jean Soh1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Ligammari vs Elizabeth Huffman1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYvonne Davis / Joni Roseri vs Eileen Lee / Pamela Leichtling1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTerri Whiting / Kitty Swanson vs Yarina Birnbaum / Katie Burnside6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ligammari vs Svetlana Kanev6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoni Roseri / Kitty Swanson vs Jennifer Nemec / Christine Marschall4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $2270251024246
2CDTA S A18W4.0 7MT Bann Breger Tue 6:30 $2761221329246
3CDTA S A18W4.0 4Tam Wright Fri 7 $2252221331268
4CDTA S A18W4.0 6Centennial Nemec Thu 7 $2034161943313
5CDTA S A18W4.0 1Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $2234161943318
6CDTA S A18W4.0 2Forest View Chmieleski Thu 7 $2324131736261
7CDTA S A18W4.0 8Glenbrook Meyer Tue 6:30 $2516142143312
8CDTA S A18W4.0 3McFetridge Newson Sat 6 $250672349321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Terri Whiting
published 4.5
3.86
Terra Jahns
published 4
3.82
Erica Eisner
published 4
3.80
Svetlana Petrova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Jennifer Ligammari
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.69
Lici Lytle
published 4
3.69
Karen Whitebloom
published 4
3.67
Missy Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Lori Raffone
published 4
3.61
Pam Fisher
published 4
3.60
Kitty Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Conni Stinek
published 4
3.22
Yvonne Davis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Lori Bieniek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.11
Barbara Chmieleski
published 3.5
Joni Roseri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terra Jahns + Lori Raffone6454% games+5.1% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Kitty Swanson12954% games+4.3% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Erica Eisner13265% games+2.8% vs expected
Conni Stinek + Erica Eisner241754% games+0.9% vs expected
Lici Lytle + Lori Raffone151352% games−0.7% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Erica Eisner101851% games−1.1% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Terra Jahns15460% games−1.2% vs expected
Yvonne Davis + Jennifer Ligammari7155% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terri Whiting
165W–55L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
Terra Jahns
126W–80L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Svetlana Petrova
111W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Jennifer Ligammari
48W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Lici Lytle
55W–70L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Karen Whitebloom
53W–50L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Missy Frank
17W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Lori Raffone
79W–76L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Pam Fisher
88W–71L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Kitty Swanson
32W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Yvonne Davis
30W–84L career · 6 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.22
Lori Bieniek
118W–118L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Chmieleski
60W–158L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joni Roseri
19W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.