Teams

CDTA S A18W4.0 1Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

23 players · average NTRP 3.85 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesLesley Seeger / Susan Klumpner vs Jane Girard / Courtney Conway6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHannah Goldberg / Erin Baker vs Suzanne Carr / Kelly Castriotta6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesStephanie Jund vs Angela Tsang3-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesReatha Kay / Virginia Kosenkova vs Sally Washlow / Chris Purcell3-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStephanie Jund vs Svetlana Petrova2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Fuller / Reatha Kay vs Barbara Chmieleski / Yvonne Davis6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesLesley Seeger / Hannah Goldberg vs Corinn Hanson / Molly Shapiro0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTANYA Piskun vs Kelly Couris4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Jund / Jeanine Stathopoulos vs Priscilla Ewaldz / Leah Starkman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-11vs CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $22Split 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Stephanie Jund vs Elizabeth Burns / Anna Gjerlow4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Fuller / Hannah Goldberg vs Antje Boeing / Marjorie Baltazar6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesReatha Kay vs Jessica Wagner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesIllana Hodges / Sarah Schaus vs Masako Ueda / Hilary Hoye3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeanine Stathopoulos / Stephanie Jund vs Katie Burnside / Katherine Glattard6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTANYA Piskun vs Kristen Lay6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBess Celio / Elise Bergman vs Alison Miller / Margo Carvell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTANYA Piskun vs Leah Bian6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Fuller / Meghan Ahlgrim vs Cate Le / Renee Zha6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $2270251024246
2CDTA S A18W4.0 7MT Bann Breger Tue 6:30 $2761221329246
3CDTA S A18W4.0 4Tam Wright Fri 7 $2252221331268
4CDTA S A18W4.0 6Centennial Nemec Thu 7 $2034161943313
5CDTA S A18W4.0 1Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $2234161943318
6CDTA S A18W4.0 2Forest View Chmieleski Thu 7 $2324131736261
7CDTA S A18W4.0 8Glenbrook Meyer Tue 6:30 $2516142143312
8CDTA S A18W4.0 3McFetridge Newson Sat 6 $250672349321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Chandana Namburi
published 4.5
4.14
3.86
Susan Klumpner
published
3.85
Lesley Seeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Hannah Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Stephanie Jund
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.75
Illana Hodges
published 4
3.66
Meghan Ahlgrim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Reatha Kay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.59
3.58
Krista Klund
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.50
Annalisa Tsai
published 4
3.48
Virginia Kosenkova
published 3.5
3.44
Bess Celio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Rachel Orlowski
published 3.5
3.39
Morgan Carr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Elise Bergman
published 3.5
3.23
Rachel Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Abby Ross
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Erin Baker
published
Meg Greenberg
published
Sarah Schaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
TANYA Piskun
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elise Bergman + Morgan Carr11364% games+13.7% vs expected
Virginia Kosenkova + Morgan Carr8157% games+11.3% vs expected
Susan Klumpner + Jeanine Stathopoulos8161% games+7.1% vs expected
Illana Hodges + Stephanie Jund3450% games−2.6% vs expected
Rachel Orlowski + Elise Bergman2540% games−8.2% vs expected
Illana Hodges + Annalisa Tsai4351% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Ahlgrim + Elise Bergman2453% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Jund + Jeanine Stathopoulos6061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandana Namburi
64W–47L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
4
Jeanine Stathopoulos
163W–71L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Susan Klumpner
117W–94L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Lesley Seeger
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Hannah Goldberg
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Stephanie Jund
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Illana Hodges
164W–79L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Meghan Ahlgrim
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Reatha Kay
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Stephanie Thompson
146W–154L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Krista Klund
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
4
Annalisa Tsai
122W–81L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Virginia Kosenkova
63W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Bess Celio
33W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Rachel Orlowski
61W–63L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Morgan Carr
49W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
3.5
Elise Bergman
70W–94L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Rachel Fuller
43W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Abby Ross
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Erin Baker
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meg Greenberg
30W–84L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Schaus
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
TANYA Piskun
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.