Teams

CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

25 players · average NTRP 3.95 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesSofia Velasco / Hilary Fife vs Desiree Witte / Leah Starkman6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMary Pat Barbarie vs Alison Morimoto2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Gjerlow / Laura Purcell vs Catherine Battin / Kristen Lay6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSofia Velasco vs Rebecca Daly6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMary Pat Barbarie vs Sara Olson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Huffman / Jean Soh vs Ashley Kaufman / Melissa Schopin1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Huffman vs Jennifer Ligammari6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAna Chang / Elizabeth Huffman vs Illana Hodges / Jeanine Stathopoulos7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Anna Gjerlow vs Stephanie Thompson / Stephanie Jund6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMary Kate Montgomery vs Virginia Kosenkova2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Mary Kate Montgomery vs Leah Bian / Renee Zha6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSofia Velasco vs Angela Tsang6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDawn Baumann / Mary Kate Montgomery vs Kim Johnson Flodin / Carolyn Walden6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.0 5Tam Lund Wed 7 $2270251024246
2CDTA S A18W4.0 7MT Bann Breger Tue 6:30 $2761221329246
3CDTA S A18W4.0 4Tam Wright Fri 7 $2252221331268
4CDTA S A18W4.0 6Centennial Nemec Thu 7 $2034161943313
5CDTA S A18W4.0 1Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $2234161943318
6CDTA S A18W4.0 2Forest View Chmieleski Thu 7 $2324131736261
7CDTA S A18W4.0 8Glenbrook Meyer Tue 6:30 $2516142143312
8CDTA S A18W4.0 3McFetridge Newson Sat 6 $250672349321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Elizabeth Huffman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Marie Reece
published 4
4.22
Sofia Velasco
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Tracy Reece
published 4
4.03
Ana Chang
published 4
3.95
Haina Shin
published 4
3.95
Dawn Baumann
published 4
3.94
3.83
Bella Sirpilla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Jean Soh
published 4
3.77
Mary Kate Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Elizabeth Burns
published 4
Isabel Quinones
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Eileen Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Hilary Fife
published 4
3.51
Anna Gjerlow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
3.46
3.39
Antje Boeing
published 3.5
3.37
Gaelle Gravot
published 3.5
3.33
Agnieszka Fijol
published 3.5
Jennifer Koo
published
Mary Pat Barbarie
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Agnieszka Fijol + Emily Lund7065% games+13.1% vs expected
Laura Purcell + Antje Boeing24756% games+11.8% vs expected
Jean Soh + Marjorie Baltazar10364% games+10.7% vs expected
Marie Reece + Tracy Reece52769% games+9.1% vs expected
Ana Chang + Tracy Reece9166% games+5.8% vs expected
Haina Shin + Ana Chang6359% games+5.3% vs expected
Dawn Baumann + Eileen Lee201657% games+4.9% vs expected
Isabel Quinones + Bella Sirpilla6255% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Huffman
88W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Marie Reece
180W–44L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.22
Sofia Velasco
23W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
4.22
4
Tracy Reece
104W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.20
4
Ana Chang
210W–115L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Haina Shin
290W–131L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Sotiria Tryfonopoulos
64W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Bella Sirpilla
26W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jean Soh
468W–283L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Mary Kate Montgomery
31W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Burns
34W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Isabel Quinones
29W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eileen Lee
136W–123L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Hilary Fife
107W–70L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Anna Gjerlow
20W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Marjorie Baltazar
183W–85L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Pamela Leichtling
49W–113L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Antje Boeing
92W–74L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Gaelle Gravot
37W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Agnieszka Fijol
130W–118L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Jennifer Koo
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Pat Barbarie
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.