Teams

Briggs-Letts/Rogers/SVCC

2024 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-12vs Dillard/Fayetteville/SRCLost 03
L#1 SinglesJeannine Wheeler vs Brooke Redfern2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNur Kamilah Chrenka vs Jamia Weir4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDeanna Cicatiello vs Gwendy Lefforge4-6, 6-7
2024-12-12vs Nelson/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesNur Kamilah Chrenka vs Abbi Nelson7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKaty Lollar vs Brooke Bricker4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesTalia McGowan vs Cristina Rosas7-5, 6-7
2024-11-17vs Webb/Bentonville/PCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesJeannine Wheeler vs Melissa Ocarroll6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNur Kamilah Chrenka vs Leann Akers6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Alison Plager6-1, 6-1
2024-11-07vs Hurley-Miller/BV/KTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesNur Kamilah Chrenka vs Meera Narayan7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Michelle van Schenck6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKara Briggs vs Michelle Goshert5-7, 4-6
2024-11-03vs Webb/Bentonville/PCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesDeanna Cicatiello vs Leann Akers1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaty Lollar vs Suzanne Lankford1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Murray Crawford6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-27vs Dillard/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Gwendy Lefforge6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTalia McGowan vs Sherri Dillard6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Kimberly Brooks3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Michelle Kehoe
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Laurie Letts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Jeannine Wheeler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.28
Katy Lollar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Talia McGowan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.21
Nur Kamilah Chrenka
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.20
Deanna Cicatiello
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Kara Briggs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katy Lollar + Jeannine Wheeler314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Kehoe
31W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Laurie Letts
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Jeannine Wheeler
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Katy Lollar
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Talia McGowan
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Nur Kamilah Chrenka
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Deanna Cicatiello
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Kara Briggs
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.