Teams

USTA Atlanta/Kim Gillon

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-24vs Fowler Park (Roxie Franks)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesWanda Grant / Elaine Wood vs Kaye Stanzione / Debbie Yancey4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Barbara Gauthier vs Laura Dodd / Jane White6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGayle Bryan / Linda Douglas vs Jeramie Gibson / Vicky Wyche6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-22vs Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesWanda Grant / Janet Sadler-Akers vs Barbara Boyd / Sandra Depa7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGayle Bryan / Elaine Wood vs Dorothy Pahner / Carolyn Waters6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Barbara Gauthier vs Eva Hofrichter / Lana Imerman6-4, 7-5
2025-10-17vs Fowler Park (Vickie Quinn)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Sue Stovall vs Lynn Alexander / Vickie Quinn6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNina Day / Kathleen Petro vs Kim Barnes / Beverly Bishop7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWanda Grant / Elaine Wood vs Terry Graham / Amelia Schietinger6-3, 6-2
2025-10-03vs Fowler Park (Roxie Franks)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesElaine Wood / Wanda Grant vs Debbie Yancey / Kaye Stanzione6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gauthier / Kathleen Petro vs Roxie Franks / Jane White6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKim Gillon / Nina Day vs Jeramie Gibson / Vicky Wyche4-6, 1-6
2025-09-26vs Fowler Park (Vickie Quinn)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Lory Tuholski vs Lynn Alexander / Beverly Bishop6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeresa Greenwood / Sue Stovall vs Kim Barnes / Pat McGinnis5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesWanda Grant / Janet Sadler-Akers vs Tracey Buck / Sandra Ford6-3, 6-2
2025-09-19vs Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Gauthier / Kathleen Petro vs Barbara Boyd / Patti Pickett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Gillon / Wanda Grant vs Dorothy Pahner / Mary Meehan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Gayle Bryan vs Carolyn Waters / Barbara Nathan6-2, 6-0
2022-03-18vs Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Gillon / Harriet Loethen vs Bonnie Watson / LINDA PHILLIPS6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoyce Yarbrough / Kathy Merrill vs Carolyn Waters / Linda Damsker6-1, 6-0
2022-02-26vs Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*Won 20
W#2 DoublesKim Gillon / Harriet Loethen vs Margaret Breiner / Danelle Haakenson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Joyce Yarbrough vs Janey McNeil / Susan Seebeck6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Teresa Greenwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sue Stovall
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Everely Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.94
Gayle Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Janet Sadler-Akers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Elaine Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Lory Tuholski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Barbara Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Wanda Grant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Kathy Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Kim Gillon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Kathleen Petro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Linda Douglas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Tuholski + Kathleen Petro5159% games+15.6% vs expected
Everely Lawrence + Kathy Merrill33665% games+10.4% vs expected
Kathy Merrill + Lory Tuholski6064% games+7.9% vs expected
Everely Lawrence + Lory Tuholski7261% games+7.8% vs expected
Barbara Gauthier + Kathleen Petro16754% games+6.6% vs expected
Sue Stovall + Teresa Greenwood19659% games+5.7% vs expected
Wanda Grant + Elaine Wood11261% games+5.3% vs expected
Lory Tuholski + Barbara Gauthier4552% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Greenwood
75W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sue Stovall
85W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Everely Lawrence
99W–41L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Gayle Bryan
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Janet Sadler-Akers
41W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Elaine Wood
45W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lory Tuholski
66W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Barbara Gauthier
43W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Wanda Grant
82W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Kathy Merrill
82W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Kim Gillon
58W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Kathleen Petro
51W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Linda Douglas
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Nina Day
12W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.