Teams

McGhee TC (Gladis Harris)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*Split 11
W#2 DoublesGladis Harris / Aaliyah Slaton vs Rosie Cecil / Paisri Untachantr5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesP-Chez Martin / Mary Sibley vs Jean Bell / Carolyn Redfearn6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-17vs Dekalb TC (Peggy Spencer)*Split 11
L#2 DoublesDorothy Johnson / Mary Sibley vs Susan Patterson / Billie Sherrod4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarian Pressley / Janice Pierce vs Judy Reid / Lynda Roberts2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-10vs Four Seasons (Mary Jane MacLeod)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDale Bennett / Yvonne Waters vs Janet Pridgen / Nancy Willard1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Robinson / P-Chez Martin vs Jan Hardwick / Cheryl Werkheiser2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Wilson / Gloria Scott vs Anne Haddox / Linda Dickerson0-6, 2-6
2025-10-03vs Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesDale Bennett / Mary Sibley vs Cathy Breedlove / Paisri Untachantr7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDorothy Johnson / Gloria Scott vs Thomasine Parker / Carolyn Redfearn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-26vs Dekalb TC (Peggy Spencer)*Split 11
L#2 DoublesGladis Harris / Aaliyah Slaton vs Karen Bruhns / Sherry McHenry2-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesP-Chez Martin / Marilyn Robinson vs Susan Patterson / Peggy Spencer6-4, 6-1
2025-09-19vs Four Seasons (Mary Jane MacLeod)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesMary Sibley / Yvonne Waters vs Cheryl Werkheiser / Anne Haddox7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Wilson / Janice Pierce vs Mary Jane MacLeod / Nancy Willard1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesP-Chez Martin / Marilyn Robinson vs Diane McIntosh / Cheryl Brussow6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cherokee Bluff (Renee Bullard)*60171399
2Life Time Peachtree Corners (Kendall Collier)*5114411110
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gillon5112615150
4Berkeley Hills (Wanda Bennewitz)*5113515136
5Four Seasons (Mary Jane MacLeod)*4213513119
6Rock Springs (Pam Williams)*4210818135
7Bradshaw Farm (Sue Hardy)*4211718150
8Holly Springs (Marilyn Pope)*429921175
9McGhee TC (Gladis Harris)*429922162
10Kennworth (Linda Lanham)*3310817146
11Fowler Park (Vickie Quinn)*3381021171
12Sandy Springs RC (Michelle Liebergesell)*249920157
13Fowler Park (Roxie Franks)*2481024184
14Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*2481024174
15Dekalb TC (Peggy Spencer)*2471125171
16Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*2471127182
17Rhodes Jordan (Terry Aiello)*2461229195
18Olde Towne (Victoria Rappe)*1561224171
19Villages at Deaton Creek (Mary Younie)*0631530181
20Huntcliff (Holly Iyer)*0601836212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dale Bennett
published 3
2.74
Marilyn Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Mary Sibley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
P-Chez Martin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Aaliyah Slaton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Janice Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Gloria Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dorothy Johnson
published
Gladis Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Thompson
published
Marcia Bautista
published
Marian Pressley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yvonne Waters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Robinson + Dale Bennett4349% games+6.5% vs expected
P-Chez Martin + Marilyn Robinson3347% games+1.6% vs expected
Dorothy Johnson + Gloria Scott2346% games−0.6% vs expected
Dorothy Johnson + Dale Bennett4644% games−3.1% vs expected
Dorothy Johnson + Marilyn Robinson6453% games−3.1% vs expected
Gladis Harris + Dorothy Johnson4939% games−7.4% vs expected
Gladis Harris + Marilyn Robinson21027% games−14.0% vs expected
Gladis Harris + Gloria Scott1734% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dale Bennett
33W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marilyn Robinson
33W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Mary Sibley
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
P-Chez Martin
10W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Aaliyah Slaton
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Janice Pierce
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Gloria Scott
30W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Dorothy Johnson
26W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gladis Harris
19W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Bautista
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marian Pressley
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Waters
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.