Teams

Sandy Springs RC (Michelle Liebergesell)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Huntcliff (Holly Iyer)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesRuth Dayman / Cindy Lightfine vs Pat Rhyner / Margaret Krengel6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Barton / Florence Trego vs Katherine Jenkins / Lois Fowler6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDianne Wright / Michelle Liebergesell vs Holly Iyer / Suzy Wilner6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMayme Holcombe / Cynthia Meadows vs Lucy Evans / Deborah Pantina1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Lightfine / Ruth Dayman vs Kendall Collier / Kimberly Jimenez6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSarah Prescott / Florence Trego vs Janet Feeley / Susan Foster5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-10vs Berkeley Hills (Wanda Bennewitz)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Meadows / Michelle Liebergesell vs Eva M Parks / JoAnne Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Barton / Mayme Holcombe vs Susanne ODom / Deb Ulrich0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDianne Wright / Sarah Prescott vs Janice Hansil / Susan Engle6-7, 0-6
2025-10-03vs Huntcliff (Holly Iyer)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Meadows / Michelle Liebergesell vs Kathy Myers / Eileen Niren7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMayme Holcombe / Donna Barton vs Margaret Krengel / Katherine Jenkins3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Prescott / Florence Trego vs Holly Iyer / Lois Fowler6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesRuth Dayman / Cindy Lightfine vs Lucy Evans / Marian Lochry3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Greenwald / Cynthia Meadows vs Denise Brew / Janet Feeley0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDianne Wright / Mayme Holcombe vs Lorraine Wais / Athena Sarris2-6, 3-6
2025-09-19vs Berkeley Hills (Wanda Bennewitz)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Liebergesell / Cindy Lightfine vs Karla Wright / Shannon Johnson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Barton / Lori Greenwald vs Christine Haer / Susanne ODom3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFlorence Trego / Sarah Prescott vs Joann McArthur / Janice Hansil1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cherokee Bluff (Renee Bullard)*60171399
2Life Time Peachtree Corners (Kendall Collier)*5114411110
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gillon5112615150
4Berkeley Hills (Wanda Bennewitz)*5113515136
5Four Seasons (Mary Jane MacLeod)*4213513119
6Rock Springs (Pam Williams)*4210818135
7Bradshaw Farm (Sue Hardy)*4211718150
8Holly Springs (Marilyn Pope)*429921175
9McGhee TC (Gladis Harris)*429922162
10Kennworth (Linda Lanham)*3310817146
11Fowler Park (Vickie Quinn)*3381021171
12Sandy Springs RC (Michelle Liebergesell)*249920157
13Fowler Park (Roxie Franks)*2481024184
14Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*2481024174
15Dekalb TC (Peggy Spencer)*2471125171
16Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*2471127182
17Rhodes Jordan (Terry Aiello)*2461229195
18Olde Towne (Victoria Rappe)*1561224171
19Villages at Deaton Creek (Mary Younie)*0631530181
20Huntcliff (Holly Iyer)*0601836212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Cindy Lightfine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Ruth Dayman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Florence Trego
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Cynthia Meadows
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Sarah Prescott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Michelle Liebergesell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Donna Barton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Dianne Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Mayme Holcombe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Greenwald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Liebergesell + Cynthia Meadows4350% games−5.6% vs expected
Cindy Lightfine + Ruth Dayman224 matchesnot enough data
Florence Trego + Sarah Prescott123 matchesnot enough data
Mayme Holcombe + Donna Barton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Lightfine
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Ruth Dayman
31W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Florence Trego
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Cynthia Meadows
11W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Sarah Prescott
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Michelle Liebergesell
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Donna Barton
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Dianne Wright
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Mayme Holcombe
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Lori Greenwald
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.