Teams

Kennworth (Linda Lanham)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Holly Springs (Marilyn Pope)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesEdie Cox / Ann Wood vs Susan Rasmussen / Jane Vincenzi6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLori Cybulskis / Eula Key vs Kay C Graham / Elaine Myatt4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Lanham / Brenda Magee vs Marilyn Pope / Wanda Lucas5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-17vs Bradshaw Farm (Sue Hardy)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Edie Cox vs Iris Mendralla / Susan Smith2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Cybulskis / Brenda Magee vs Sue Hardy / Frieda Matthews6-4, 6-1
2025-10-10vs Olde Towne (Victoria Rappe)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesEula Key / Ann Wood vs Janie Sukloff / Dolores Svensson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Cybulskis / Judy Gaither vs Dianne Holt Armistead / Barbara Gohlinghorst6-1, 6-0
2025-10-03vs Holly Springs (Marilyn Pope)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesEdie Cox / Ann Wood vs Sharon Ausenbaugh / Wendy Morin7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEula Key / Lori Cybulskis vs Jo Ann Bigelow / Jane Vincenzi6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Magee / Linda Lanham vs Debra Copeland / Wanda Lucas6-4, 6-1
2025-09-26vs Bradshaw Farm (Sue Hardy)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEdie Cox / Susan Lindberg vs Iris Mendralla / Frieda Matthews4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEula Key / Lori Cybulskis vs Diane Granato / Susan Weiland6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinda Lanham / Debra Syfert vs Deborah Gower / Delores Martin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-19vs Olde Towne (Victoria Rappe)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesEdie Cox / Susan Lindberg vs Jeanie Posey / Elizabeth Hardin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrenda Magee / Ann Wood vs Rebecca Myers / Victoria Davis Rappe6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Lanham / Jeanine Walker vs Barbara Gohlinghorst / Dianne Holt Armistead4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Edie Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Lori Cybulskis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Eula Key
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Jeanine Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Debra Syfert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ann Wood
published 3
2.68
Linda Lanham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Brenda Magee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Judy Gaither
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Lindberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edie Cox + Susan Lindberg231057% games+4.2% vs expected
Linda Lanham + Jeanine Walker3450% games+0.8% vs expected
Eula Key + Lori Cybulskis3253% games+0.8% vs expected
Eula Key + Ann Wood15951% games−1.8% vs expected
Brenda Magee + Lori Cybulskis41242% games−2.5% vs expected
Lori Cybulskis + Debra Syfert51640% games−9.7% vs expected
Linda Lanham + Debra Syfert4943% games−11.2% vs expected
Brenda Magee + Susan Lindberg3450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edie Cox
50W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Lori Cybulskis
30W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Eula Key
37W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Jeanine Walker
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Debra Syfert
25W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ann Wood
31W–32L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Lanham
22W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Brenda Magee
13W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Judy Gaither
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Lindberg
49W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.