Teams

Ray/Goy 18s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-10vs Majestic 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKim Hunt vs Jessica Huellmantel5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-19vs Goodman/Satterfield 18s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Hertweck / Kim Hunt vs Joy Martin / Kris Downing2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-12vs WARRICK 18s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Stacey Dennehy vs Chris Amos / Suzanne Rudy6-1, 6-2
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKim Hunt vs Kayli Bushnell3-6, 2-6
2022-03-22vs Brown K. 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Kim Hunt vs Kathy Hedgecock / Tammy Dickenson2-6, 3-6
2022-03-21vs Albright 18s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Kim Hunt vs Carole Albright / Aprille Black7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristin Williamson
published
3.80
Madison Bowen
published
3.73
Laura Hertweck
published
3.72
Christine Hinch
published 4
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
3.60
Gina Goy
published 4
3.54
Lisa Andree
published
3.39
3.25
Kathy Chinnis
published
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
3.08
Elia Mavronikolas
published 3.5
3.08
Paula Gebhard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Williamson + Madison Bowen16365% games+11.6% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Madison Bowen
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Laura Hertweck
17W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christine Hinch
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 15 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Gina Goy
34W–35L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lisa Andree
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elia Mavronikolas
27W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Paula Gebhard
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.