Teams

WARRICK 18s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-26vs Easley 18s 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Paige Yates vs Layne Saunders / Claudia Rodriguez6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-17vs Albright 18s 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Chris Amos vs Stephanie Keaney / Susan Pardue7-5, 6-3
2022-03-29vs Goodman/Satterfield 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Suzanne Rudy vs Melissa Goodman / Trish Holder1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-20vs Easley 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Lane / Sallye Parker vs Dell Barbee / Angela Muller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-15vs Majestic 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Paige Yates vs Bee Baker / Carrie Ganim0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Andrea Shafer
published 4
3.69
Lynn Jacoby
published
3.68
Karen Robinson
published
3.63
Paige Yates
published
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Chris Amos
published 4
3.37
Suzanne Rudy
published
Debbie Lane
published 3.5
3.23
Donna Warrick
published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Gilmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Robinson + Lynn Jacoby2346% games−10.3% vs expected
Paige Yates + Donna Warrick0541% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Rudy + Lynn Jacoby224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Shafer
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Lynn Jacoby
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Karen Robinson
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Paige Yates
17W–22L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Chris Amos
5W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.41
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.37
3.5
Debbie Lane
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Warrick
11W–23L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.