Teams

Albright 18s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-17vs WARRICK 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / LAISBETH HIGUEREY vs Lynn Jacoby / Karen Robinson2-6, 6-7
2022-04-12vs Goodman/Satterfield 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Britt Flanagan vs Bobbie Westrick / Cheryl Scott5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-22vs Easley 18s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / LAISBETH HIGUEREY vs Angela Muller / Elaine Fox6-3, 6-1
2022-03-21vs Ray/Goy 18s 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLAISBETH HIGUEREY / Emily Wilson vs Gina Goy / Kristin Williamson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ibby Greene
published 4
3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.51
Kimberly Halsey
published
3.50
Virginia Christman
published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.25
Rosa Phillips
published
3.21
Stephanie Keaney
published
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
LAISBETH HIGUEREY
published
Susan Pardue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Albright + Virginia Christman224 matchesnot enough data
Aprille Black + Susan Pardue303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ibby Greene
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Kimberly Halsey
59W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
Virginia Christman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rosa Phillips
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Stephanie Keaney
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–21L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 9 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
LAISBETH HIGUEREY
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Pardue
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.