Teams

Easley 18s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-03vs Goodman/Satterfield 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVirginia Easley / Karyn Efird vs Rhyssa Earley / Bonnie Satterfield4-6, 1-6
2022-04-19vs Majestic 18s 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesVirginia Easley / Karyn Efird vs Sarah Dunning / Brenda Willis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Elam / Elaine Fox vs Kimberly Eberhard / Diane Majestic0-6, 0-6
2022-04-13vs Brown K. 18s 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Marissa Klee vs Pam McAmis / Minerva Loran6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Lynette Paley vs Kathy Brown / Shawn McFarlin2-6, 4-6
2022-03-29vs Ray/Goy 18s 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesDell Barbee / Karyn Efird vs Kristin Williamson / Gina Goy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Lynette Paley vs Elia Mavronikolas / Stacey Dennehy6-2, 6-2
2022-03-22vs Albright 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAngela Muller / Elaine Fox vs Emily Wilson / LAISBETH HIGUEREY3-6, 1-6
2022-03-20vs WARRICK 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn Efird / Marissa Klee vs Suzanne Rudy / Karen Robinson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-15vs Goodman/Satterfield 18s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Fox / Layne Saunders vs Bonnie Satterfield / Terri Shantry3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Marissa Klee
published
3.83
Layne Saunders
published
3.77
Virginia Easley
published
3.67
Claire Parsons
published 4
3.65
Dell Barbee
published 4
3.58
Karyn Efird
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.48
Melissa Baker
published
3.37
Lynette Paley
published
Angela Muller
published 3.5
3.22
Elaine Fox
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Jill Elam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karyn Efird + Elaine Fox2344% gamesnot enough data
Dell Barbee + Virginia Easley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Klee
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Layne Saunders
153W–75L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Virginia Easley
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Claire Parsons
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 14 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Melissa Baker
37W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
Lynette Paley
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Angela Muller
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elaine Fox
113W–96L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Jill Elam
19W–31L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.