Teams

Thomasson

2022 Anne Arundel Combo · Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-17vs KochWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Eugene Spencer vs JD Zachry / Greg Koch6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Lavinder / Jason Levin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-15vs KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Todd Trapnell vs JD Zachry / Greg Koch7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-28vs KochSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Eugene Spencer vs Matt Schlegel / Scott A Green7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Frank von Hendricks vs JD Zachry / Joshua Sadler3-6, 2-6
2022-08-19vs KochLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Todd Trapnell vs Brian Kovalski / Ken Mitchell3-6, 3-6
2022-08-14vs KochWon 20
W#1 DoublesEugene Spencer / Adam Thomasson vs Scott A Green / Brian Kovalski7-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Isch / Jack Lavinder vs Joshua Sadler / Key Sar6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-06vs KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Jason Levin vs Michael Bernhard / Matt Schlegel6-4, 6-1
2022-07-30vs KochSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Jason Levin vs Kushal Patel / Michael Bernhard7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Todd Trapnell vs Matthew Casbarro / Ken Mitchell6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Joshua Fretz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.86
Adam Thomasson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Jack Lavinder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Walter Winston
published
3.58
Matthew Kennedy
published
3.54
Brian Kuhn
published 4
3.49
Frank von Hendricks
published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
3.10
Eugene Spencer
published 3.5
Jason Levin
published
Todd Trapnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Lavinder + Joshua Fretz3549% games−6.6% vs expected
Adam Thomasson + Joshua Fretz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joshua Fretz
161W–117L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Adam Thomasson
151W–127L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Jack Lavinder
98W–102L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Christopher Gowen
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Walter Winston
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Matthew Kennedy
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Brian Kuhn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Frank von Hendricks
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Eugene Spencer
7W–27L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jason Levin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Trapnell
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.