Teams

CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Forest View Werts Sat 11 $21

CDTA Summer Mixed 18 & over · CDTA 18 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesTanja Boskovic / Cody Schullo vs Terri Parse / Jorge Trejo6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / Michael Lawver vs Dwight Janzen / Laura Stroede6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSoYoung Grote / Norlin Monzon vs Atwood Burns / Zanobia Syed6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesJoan Cooney / Michael Lawver vs Arkadiusz Bryja / Tracy Merrell6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJazz Burks / Jill Werts vs Megan Crisham / John Simonetti3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNorlin Monzon / Marie Venckus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJazz Burks / Julie Savanelli vs Marjorie Baltazar / Rod Ganesan4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoan Cooney / Norlin Monzon vs Sarah Haas / Brian Atad3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMariusz Cislak / Alicia Tisbo vs Diana Atad / Carlos del Moral6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesApple Naughton / Mariusz Cislak vs Rochelle Probst / Young Choi4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJill Werts / Cody Schullo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSoYoung Grote / Norlin Monzon vs Christi Harrison / Mark Ainsworth2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMariusz Cislak / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Victoria Dargis / Matthew Shearer6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTanja Boskovic / Michael Lawver vs Mike Herlihy / Patricia Morin6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoan Cooney / Cody Schullo vs Gregory Morin / Jessica Liefer6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA 18 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Tam Wright Tues 7 $226014414146
2CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Forest View Werts Sat 11 $213210514119
3CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Wimbledon Janzen Fri 7:30 $203381023188
4CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Forest View Hayashida Sun 9 $21226614101
5CDTA S M18&O 7.0X McFetridge Baltazar Sat 1 $20238716124
6CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Centennial Sioufi Sun 1 $202481021163
7CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Forest View Korczak Sat 9 $211531532201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jazz Burks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Cody Schullo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Apple Naughton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Mariusz Cislak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Dimitrina Schoyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Michael Lawver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Marie Venckus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
SoYoung Grote
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alicia Tisbo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Joan Cooney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Jill Werts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julie Savanelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Norlin Monzon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Apple Naughton + Mariusz Cislak291357% games+3.7% vs expected
Julie Savanelli + Jazz Burks6646% games−1.7% vs expected
Tanja Boskovic + Mariusz Cislak8460% games−3.9% vs expected
Jill Werts + Jazz Burks4844% games−9.4% vs expected
Marie Venckus + Michael Lawver13755% gamesnot enough data
Dimitrina Schoyer + Mariusz Cislak13256% gamesnot enough data
Dimitrina Schoyer + Jazz Burks10461% gamesnot enough data
Marie Venckus + Mariusz Cislak6261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jazz Burks
229W–226L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Cody Schullo
94W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Mariusz Cislak
254W–157L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Michael Lawver
113W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Marie Venckus
92W–63L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
SoYoung Grote
111W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alicia Tisbo
27W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Joan Cooney
96W–133L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jill Werts
81W–179L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Julie Savanelli
76W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Norlin Monzon
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.