Teams

HCC Lines

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Wed

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-27vs TDC IurilloWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Kim Magnano vs Heather Long / Leslie Baker6-1, 6-1
2021-10-18vs WOCC Oaks MoehlingWon 10
W#2 DoublesAbbey Orski / AMY LINES vs Beth Kelly / Anne Scher6-0, 6-1
2021-09-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crotty / AMY LINES vs Marshall Rigby / Brooke Wick6-1, 6-0
2021-09-15vs RCC KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Sarah Martin vs Penny Lobred / Kim Earle6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Abbey Orski
published 4
3.63
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.29
Sarah Martin
published
3.22
Kathy Harcum
published
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
2.92
2.68
Alexia Gerczak
published 3
2.67
Kristen Wood
published
2.63
Debra Suyama
published 3
2.40
Virginia Cochran
published
2.23
Margaretha Valderas
published
2.23
Beth Stuckey
published 2.5
Kim Magnano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Cochran + Kristen Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Abbey Orski
15W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
Sarah Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Kathy Harcum
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Alexia Gerczak
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Kristen Wood
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Debra Suyama
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
Virginia Cochran
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.40
Margaretha Valderas
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Beth Stuckey
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.23
Kim Magnano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.