Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $25

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDonna Salvatore / Robin Meister vs Carol Paddock / Karen Scala2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRosie Weaver / Karen Hirsch vs Teresa Simchak / Leah Cannon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCena Glaser / Kay Noonan vs Barbara Chmieleski / Lynn Greisman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Weinberg / Jo Ellen Reed vs Mary Jo Scarpelli / Miriam Wozniewski0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Hirsch / Marie Fischl vs Maureen Kiess / Leanne Whitlock1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJo Ellen Reed / Kay Noonan vs Rita Williams / Margo Carvell3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDonna Salvatore / Cate Brodner vs Rita Eichner / Shari Pew2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTomoko Sekigami / Jennifer Cicciu vs Kathleen Sullivan / Laurie Sandman3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Meister / Karen Edidin vs Jamie Sylvan / Rochelle Meng6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichele Young / Sarah W Johnson vs Mary Patrick / Midge Mountin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosie Weaver / Karen Hirsch vs Diane Ramoska / Teresa Simchak6-3, 5-3
W#3 DoublesTomoko Sekigami / Joanne Lund vs Lori Lamey / Lidia Dyjewski6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesValerie Anderson / Donna Salvatore vs Mary Jo Scarpelli / Erica Eisner2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Meister / Joanne Lund vs Lynn Greisman / Joan Cooney6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSheila Weinberg / Rosie Weaver vs Susan Holmberg / Miriam Wozniewski6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah W Johnson / Cate Brodner vs Ryoko Howell / SUSAN SHEEHAN5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesKay Noonan / Jo Ellen Reed vs Margo Carvell / Peggy Schwerman1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMichele Young / Tomoko Sekigami vs Elisa Zusman / Vicki Tickman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCate Brodner / Donna Salvatore vs Debra Feldman / Rosemary Wheeler2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $259124615168
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Schaumburg Hayslett Sun 1 $1873181231260
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Lake Bluff Pew Sun 4 $2046151534255
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Tam Wolff Sat 4 $2046121840273
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Heritage Wozniewski Sat 1 $2137121837261
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Joanne Lund
published 4
3.30
Karen Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Cate Brodner
published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Cicciu
published 3.5
3.03
Sarah W Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Donna Salvatore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Rosie Weaver
published 3.5
2.43
Kay Noonan
published 3
Cena Glaser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jo Ellen Reed
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Edidin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Meister
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sheila Weinberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tomoko Sekigami
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cate Brodner + Jennifer Cicciu3546% games+2.5% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Sarah W Johnson211153% games+1.3% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Donna Salvatore51638% games−4.8% vs expected
Jennifer Cicciu + Sheila Weinberg101153% gamesnot enough data
Rosie Weaver + Sheila Weinberg6549% gamesnot enough data
Sarah W Johnson + Donna Salvatore2841% gamesnot enough data
Kay Noonan + Jennifer Cicciu3442% gamesnot enough data
Cate Brodner + Sheila Weinberg7066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joanne Lund
172W–88L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
Karen Hirsch
69W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cate Brodner
96W–153L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Cicciu
36W–68L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Sarah W Johnson
91W–135L career · 2 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Donna Salvatore
12W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3.5
Rosie Weaver
31W–50L career · type S · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.81
3
Kay Noonan
46W–104L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Barbara Kramer Dibble
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Cena Glaser
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jo Ellen Reed
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Edidin
8W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robin Meister
14W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Weinberg
23W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tomoko Sekigami
15W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Anderson
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.