Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Schaumburg Hayslett Sun 1 $18

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesLeanne Whitlock / Margo Carvell vs Rosemary Wheeler / Elisa Zusman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRita Williams / Karen Hayslett vs Robin Ford / Cheryl Ingram2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMargo Carvell / Karen Salter vs Erica Eisner / Mary Jo Scarpelli2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Kiess / Leanne Whitlock vs Barbara Chmieleski / Susan Holmberg1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMaureen Kiess / Leanne Whitlock vs Karen Hirsch / Marie Fischl6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRita Williams / Margo Carvell vs Jo Ellen Reed / Kay Noonan6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKaren Salter / Ryoko Howell vs Karen Scala / Ivie Cohn6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaureen Kiess / Leanne Whitlock vs Wendy Varygiannes / Regina Lookis6-7, 5-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRita Williams / Karen Hayslett vs Sherri Wolff / Teresa Simchak0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMitzi Kastner / Karen Salter vs Elisa Zusman / Vicki Tickman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeanne Whitlock / Margo Carvell vs Rita Eichner / Debra Feldman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSUSAN SHEEHAN / Peggy Schwerman vs Robin Ford / Julie Gordon6-1, 6-5
W#1 DoublesKaren Salter / Mitzi Kastner vs Jennifer Cicciu / Michele Young6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRyoko Howell / SUSAN SHEEHAN vs Sarah W Johnson / Cate Brodner7-5, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMargo Carvell / Peggy Schwerman vs Kay Noonan / Jo Ellen Reed6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMargo Carvell / Maureen Kiess vs Mary Jo Scarpelli / Erica Eisner2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMitzi Kastner / SUSAN SHEEHAN vs Lynn Greisman / Barbara Chmieleski4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLeanne Whitlock / Margo Carvell vs Regina Lookis / Leah Cannon6-3, 5-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSUSAN SHEEHAN / Rita Williams vs Ivie Cohn / Mary Patrick1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $259124615168
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Schaumburg Hayslett Sun 1 $1873181231260
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Lake Bluff Pew Sun 4 $2046151534255
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Tam Wolff Sat 4 $2046121840273
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Heritage Wozniewski Sat 1 $2137121837261
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Margo Carvell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.46
Mitzi Kastner
published 3.5
3.04
3.02
Ryoko Howell
published 3.5
2.92
Leanne Whitlock
published 3
2.81
Karen Hayslett
published 3
2.78
Peggy Schwerman
published 3
Karen Salter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Kiess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rita Williams
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
SUSAN SHEEHAN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leanne Whitlock + Margo Carvell25458% games+9.0% vs expected
Ryoko Howell + Cecilia Lauterbach12758% games−4.6% vs expected
Leanne Whitlock + Cecilia Lauterbach2740% games−5.9% vs expected
Leanne Whitlock + Rita Williams22956% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Schwerman + Margo Carvell14557% gamesnot enough data
Karen Salter + Ryoko Howell13563% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Schwerman + Cecilia Lauterbach7848% gamesnot enough data
Margo Carvell + Ryoko Howell12360% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margo Carvell
139W–96L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Mitzi Kastner
57W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Cecilia Lauterbach
83W–87L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Ryoko Howell
82W–76L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Leanne Whitlock
83W–88L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Karen Hayslett
29W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Peggy Schwerman
123W–136L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Karen Salter
46W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Kiess
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rita Williams
33W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
SUSAN SHEEHAN
28W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.