Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $25

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesMary McNamara / Rose Northon vs Fiona Prentice / Shari Pew2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Judy Stevens vs Rochelle Meng / Lesa Vidovic6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Chalise Short vs Kathy Kasiurak / Carol Paddock5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $259124615168
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Schaumburg Hayslett Sun 1 $1873181231260
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Lake Bluff Pew Sun 4 $2046151534255
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Tam Wolff Sat 4 $2046121840273
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Heritage Wozniewski Sat 1 $2137121837261
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
published 4
3.37
Jane Strien
published 3.5
3.32
Mary Jo Kamarauskas
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Yacullo
published 3.5
3.21
Diane Fonte
published 3.5
3.15
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
published 3.5
3.12
Lori Vardas
published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
published
2.73
Sharon Martinez
published 3
Chalise Short
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Denise McGinn
published
Joan Vander Linde
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Judy Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Leahy
published
Meijan Linda Yu
published
Nancy Williford
published
Rose Northon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Ayotte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Batka + Jane Strien19073% games+11.2% vs expected
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt + Lori Vardas16859% games+7.5% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Lori Vardas26660% games+2.6% vs expected
Nancy Williford + Meijan Linda Yu301061% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Williford + Sharon Martinez21137% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Williford + Diane Fonte6552% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Leahy + Sharon Martinez6250% gamesnot enough data
Rose Northon + Michelle Yacullo8061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
3.5
Jane Strien
154W–56L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Mary Jo Kamarauskas
40W–50L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Michelle Yacullo
166W–110L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Diane Fonte
52W–44L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
156W–115L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Lori Vardas
164W–120L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Sharon Martinez
115W–167L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Chalise Short
49W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Denise McGinn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joan Vander Linde
48W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Stevens
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Leahy
33W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meijan Linda Yu
56W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Williford
76W–102L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rose Northon
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Teri Ayotte
66W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.