Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Heritage Wozniewski Sat 1 $21

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesErica Eisner / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Stephanie Batka / Lori Vardas6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesErica Eisner / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Ann Phillips / Astrid Ellis6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Miriam Wozniewski vs Jamie Sylvan / Suzanne Reed7-6, 2-0
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Miriam Wozniewski vs Sheila Weinberg / Jo Ellen Reed6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesErica Eisner / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Margo Carvell / Karen Salter6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Susan Holmberg vs Maureen Kiess / Leanne Whitlock6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoan Cooney / Miriam Wozniewski vs Peggy Schwerman / Karen Hayslett4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Gitter / Margaret Lovelette vs Teresa Simchak / Karen Scala1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesErica Eisner / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Diane Egan / Rita Eichner6-7, 2-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Miriam Wozniewski vs Robin Ford / Julie Gordon1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Erica Eisner vs Valerie Anderson / Donna Salvatore6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Holmberg / Miriam Wozniewski vs Sheila Weinberg / Rosie Weaver1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Mary Patrick / Leah Cannon1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErica Eisner / Miriam Wozniewski vs Marell Kowalski / Lidia Dyjewski6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Erica Eisner vs Margo Carvell / Maureen Kiess6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Joan Cooney vs Peggy Schwerman / Leanne Whitlock2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $259124615168
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Schaumburg Hayslett Sun 1 $1873181231260
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Lake Bluff Pew Sun 4 $2046151534255
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Tam Wolff Sat 4 $2046121840273
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Heritage Wozniewski Sat 1 $2137121837261
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 7.0W Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Erica Eisner
published 4
3.29
Marie Hajduk
published 3.5
Cynthia Gitter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Lynn Greisman
published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Chmieleski
published 3.5
2.80
Joan Cooney
published 3
2.75
Margaret Lovelette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Beth Carr
published
Mary Jo Scarpelli
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Susan Holmberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Cooney + Mary Jo Scarpelli12563% games+1.0% vs expected
Cynthia Gitter + Barbara Chmieleski1941% games−8.3% vs expected
Cynthia Gitter + Mary Jo Scarpelli71146% games−11.8% vs expected
Joan Cooney + Miriam Wozniewski51036% gamesnot enough data
Erica Eisner + Mary Jo Scarpelli12269% gamesnot enough data
Susan Holmberg + Beth Carr2939% gamesnot enough data
Erica Eisner + Miriam Wozniewski6550% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Chmieleski + Miriam Wozniewski3638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
Marie Hajduk
130W–86L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Cynthia Gitter
11W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Greisman
24W–37L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Barbara Chmieleski
60W–158L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Joan Cooney
96W–133L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Margaret Lovelette
13W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
Beth Carr
29W–50L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jo Scarpelli
58W–68L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Miriam Wozniewski
39W–80L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Holmberg
15W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.