Teams

CDTA S A40M4.0 3Tam Franks Sun 1 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesMicah Jordan / Dexter Magale vs Dal Bristow / John Gatz1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Franks / Jay Freedman vs David Maxson / Bruce Thornquist0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRick Aguayo / Eric Rodrigo vs Matt Burghgraef / Kevin Podwika3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJohn Leubner / Randy Orr vs Jason Hui / Todd Wagner5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacek Grabiec vs Charles Ahn7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErnesto Diaz / Rick Aguayo vs Douglas Ip / Young Choi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRex J Lao / Steve Franks vs Andrew Meyer / Alfred Tam2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRandy Orr / John Leubner vs Andrew Zens / Dennis Abdelnour7-6, 5-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacek Grabiec vs Christopher Urso3-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesRick Aguayo / Ernesto Diaz vs Mark Ainsworth / Venkat Maligireddy6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanny Postel / Steve Franks vs Darren Lubotsky / Keith Boutell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRex J Lao / John Leubner vs Jonathan Gawlak / Dwight Anderson1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJacek Grabiec vs Marco Amaro6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErnesto Diaz / Steve Franks vs Dean Stermer / Anthony Sammarco6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBob Schnoll / Danny Postel vs Chris O'Malley / Joel Relova6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesEric Rodrigo / Bob Schnoll vs Hazem Isawi / Rob Meier2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJacek Grabiec vs Aleksandrs Kublinskis4-6, 3-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Leubner / Vincent Vidal vs Hideaki Takahashi / Todd Dahlquist7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRick Aguayo / Ernesto Diaz vs Christian Montresor / Marco Deutsch4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40M4.0 6Naperville Podwika Thu 7 $245118616141
2CDTA S A40M4.0 2River Trails Ciuca Sat 4 $265116820169
3CDTA S A40M4.0 3Tam Franks Sun 1 $224215925186
4CDTA S A40M4.0 1Tam Bhat Tue 7 $2233131126203
5CDTA S A40M4.0 7Glenbrook Tysl Sun 5 $2533121228214
6CDTA S A40M4.0 5MT Bann Cal Sun 10 $271571735223
7CDTA S A40M4.0 4Oak Brook OMalley Thu 7 $220632143273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Jacek Grabiec
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.92
Randy Orr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
John Leubner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Jay Freedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Ernesto Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Dexter Magale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Rex J Lao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Rick Aguayo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Eric Rodrigo
published 4
3.67
Danny Postel
published 4
3.55
Bob Schnoll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.34
Steve Franks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Micah Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Zuffa
published
Vincent Vidal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Leubner + Rick Aguayo171055% games+4.2% vs expected
Ernesto Diaz + Eric Rodrigo12163% games+1.9% vs expected
Paul Zuffa + Bob Schnoll5553% games+1.2% vs expected
Ernesto Diaz + Rick Aguayo7355% games−6.9% vs expected
John Leubner + Danny Postel3653% games−10.0% vs expected
John Leubner + Eric Rodrigo11355% games−11.6% vs expected
Eric Rodrigo + Rick Aguayo0835% gamesnot enough data
John Leubner + Jacek Grabiec5258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacek Grabiec
51W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Randy Orr
60W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
John Leubner
101W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Jay Freedman
62W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Ernesto Diaz
49W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Dexter Magale
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rex J Lao
54W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Rick Aguayo
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Eric Rodrigo
64W–28L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Danny Postel
63W–66L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Bob Schnoll
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Steve Franks
34W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Micah Jordan
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Zuffa
37W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Vidal
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.