Teams

CDTA S A40M4.0 1Tam Bhat Tue 7 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zens / Dennis Abdelnour vs Randy Orr / John Leubner6-7, 6-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristopher Urso vs Jacek Grabiec6-3, 5-3
L#2 DoublesMark Ainsworth / Venkat Maligireddy vs Rick Aguayo / Ernesto Diaz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesChristopher Urso / Jonathan Sieja vs Derek Wong / Kevin Podwika6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAndrew Zens vs Craig Berry3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKeith Sgariglia / Dennis Abdelnour vs Chris Boruff / Howard Hoff3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesChristopher Urso / Jonathan Sieja vs Jonathan Gawlak / Dean Stermer6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAndrew Zens vs Saverio Suraci2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Ainsworth / Collin Moore vs Carlos Canetta / Joel Relova6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAndrew Zens / Dennis Abdelnour vs Andy Kidwell / Rob Meier3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Sieja / Christopher Urso vs Hideaki Takahashi / Jin-Won Lee6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMark Ainsworth / Marc Falkoff vs Carlos Flores / Vitalii Miziuk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAndrew Zens / Dennis Abdelnour vs Manik Dewan / Charles Phelps4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Benzer / Collin Moore vs Joey Tran / Javier Echevarria6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJonathan Sieja / Christopher Urso vs Eric Orsic / Rod Ganesan6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zens / Dennis Abdelnour vs Derek Majka / Jonathan Cooper6-7, 4-5
W#1 SinglesChristopher Urso vs Anthony Fiordaliso6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Ainsworth / Venkat Maligireddy vs Steve Mesirow / Mark Juhl7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Benzer / Marc Falkoff vs Robert Cal / DAVID ALTMAN6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40M4.0 6Naperville Podwika Thu 7 $245118616141
2CDTA S A40M4.0 2River Trails Ciuca Sat 4 $265116820169
3CDTA S A40M4.0 3Tam Franks Sun 1 $224215925186
4CDTA S A40M4.0 1Tam Bhat Tue 7 $2233131126203
5CDTA S A40M4.0 7Glenbrook Tysl Sun 5 $2533121228214
6CDTA S A40M4.0 5MT Bann Cal Sun 10 $271571735223
7CDTA S A40M4.0 4Oak Brook OMalley Thu 7 $220632143273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Christopher Urso
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Daniel Michael
published 4
3.74
Dennis Abdelnour
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.70
Ty Caughell
published
3.67
Keith Sgariglia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Collin Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Mark Ainsworth
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Andrew Zens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.50
Jonathan Sieja
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Brian Benzer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Keith Boutell
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Venkat Maligireddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Kedar Bhat
published 3.5
3.15
Darren Lubotsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Marc Falkoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Abdelnour + Andrew Zens15558% games+8.8% vs expected
Keith Sgariglia + Dennis Abdelnour9754% games+4.3% vs expected
Keith Sgariglia + Keith Boutell7650% games+1.8% vs expected
Keith Sgariglia + Andrew Zens4448% games−3.2% vs expected
Jonathan Sieja + Christopher Urso7356% gamesnot enough data
Brian Benzer + Keith Sgariglia2644% gamesnot enough data
Marc Falkoff + Keith Sgariglia5164% gamesnot enough data
Marc Falkoff + Dennis Abdelnour3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Urso
44W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Daniel Michael
16W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dennis Abdelnour
61W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Ty Caughell
30W–58L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Keith Sgariglia
90W–78L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Collin Moore
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Mark Ainsworth
52W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Andrew Zens
67W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jonathan Sieja
46W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Brian Benzer
34W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Keith Boutell
80W–99L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Venkat Maligireddy
63W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Kedar Bhat
118W–128L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Darren Lubotsky
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Marc Falkoff
33W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.