Teams

CDTA S A40M4.0 5MT Bann Cal Sun 10 $27

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

17 players · average NTRP 3.79 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesDerek Majka / Barry Marks vs Douglas Ip / Young Choi3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDAVID ALTMAN / Robert Felicelli vs Stefan Kutko / Charlie Turri1-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs CDTA S A40M4.0 1Tam Bhat Tue 7 $22Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAnthony Fiordaliso vs Christopher Urso0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Mesirow / Mark Juhl vs Mark Ainsworth / Venkat Maligireddy7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Cal / DAVID ALTMAN vs Brian Benzer / Marc Falkoff2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40M4.0 6Naperville Podwika Thu 7 $245118616141
2CDTA S A40M4.0 2River Trails Ciuca Sat 4 $265116820169
3CDTA S A40M4.0 3Tam Franks Sun 1 $224215925186
4CDTA S A40M4.0 1Tam Bhat Tue 7 $2233131126203
5CDTA S A40M4.0 7Glenbrook Tysl Sun 5 $2533121228214
6CDTA S A40M4.0 5MT Bann Cal Sun 10 $271571735223
7CDTA S A40M4.0 4Oak Brook OMalley Thu 7 $220632143273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Derek Majka
published 4
Curtis Baddeley
published 4
3.70
Felix Danciu
published
3.64
Barry Marks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Geoffrey Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Anthony Fiordaliso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.53
Stephen Ewaldz
published
3.41
Mark Juhl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Paz
published 3.5
DAVID ALTMAN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Robert Cal
published 3.5
Howard Braun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Cooper
published
Matt Newman
published
Peter Shields
published
Robert Felicelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Mesirow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Paz + Derek Majka5064% games+28.1% vs expected
Jonathan Cooper + Derek Majka4258% games+7.9% vs expected
Derek Majka + Felix Danciu5449% games+5.6% vs expected
Robert Cal + Derek Majka26659% games+4.8% vs expected
Curtis Baddeley + Derek Majka3256% games+2.7% vs expected
Robert Cal + Geoffrey Miller11856% games−1.2% vs expected
Geoffrey Miller + Derek Majka3355% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Ewaldz + Mark Juhl0535% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Derek Majka
126W–72L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Curtis Baddeley
25W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Felix Danciu
36W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Barry Marks
32W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Geoffrey Miller
57W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Anthony Fiordaliso
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Stephen Ewaldz
29W–51L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Mark Juhl
24W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Alex Paz
35W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
DAVID ALTMAN
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Robert Cal
172W–106L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Howard Braun
59W–91L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Cooper
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Newman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Shields
121W–52L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Felicelli
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steve Mesirow
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.