Teams

CDTA S A40M4.0 6Naperville Podwika Thu 7 $24

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

18 players · average NTRP 3.96 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 SinglesKurt Fenton vs Danny Postel6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Maxson / Bruce Thornquist vs Steve Franks / Jay Freedman6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCraig Berry vs Andrew Zens6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Boruff / Howard Hoff vs Keith Sgariglia / Dennis Abdelnour6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesChris Boruff / Patrick Angelo vs Jonathan Gawlak / Dwight Anderson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKurt Fenton vs Marco Amaro6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDal Bristow / David Maxson vs Chris O'Malley / Saverio Suraci6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Berry / John Gatz vs Anthony Sammarco / Dean Stermer6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMatt Burghgraef / David Maxson vs Zeno Popa / Adrian Ciuca2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKurt Fenton vs Aleksandrs Kublinskis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Angelo / Bruce Thornquist vs Brett Wangman / David Chopp6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesKevin Podwika / David Maxson vs Charles Phelps / Jason Hui3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKurt Fenton vs Misha Tseytlin6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShiv Baloo / Scott Modica vs Manik Dewan / Alfred Tam4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Angelo / Howard Hoff vs Douglas Ip / Young Choi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40M4.0 6Naperville Podwika Thu 7 $245118616141
2CDTA S A40M4.0 2River Trails Ciuca Sat 4 $265116820169
3CDTA S A40M4.0 3Tam Franks Sun 1 $224215925186
4CDTA S A40M4.0 1Tam Bhat Tue 7 $2233131126203
5CDTA S A40M4.0 7Glenbrook Tysl Sun 5 $2533121228214
6CDTA S A40M4.0 5MT Bann Cal Sun 10 $271571735223
7CDTA S A40M4.0 4Oak Brook OMalley Thu 7 $220632143273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Kurt Fenton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.98
David Maxson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Patrick Angelo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Craig Berry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
John Gatz
published 4
3.82
Matt Burghgraef
published 4
3.78
Bruce Thornquist
published 4
Dennis Markey
published 4
3.73
Chris Boruff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Kevin Podwika
published 4
3.71
Patrick Seermon
published 4
3.69
Jay Goldner
published 4
3.68
Dal Bristow
published 4
3.66
Gabriel Gonzalez
published
2.75
Eric Esancy
published 3
Howard Hoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Modica
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shiv Baloo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Goldner + Craig Berry11264% games+14.9% vs expected
Dal Bristow + John Gatz7561% games+10.2% vs expected
David Maxson + Matt Burghgraef5060% games+8.3% vs expected
Dal Bristow + Eric Esancy4451% games+8.1% vs expected
Patrick Angelo + Bruce Thornquist5061% games+7.3% vs expected
Matt Burghgraef + Chris Boruff3256% games+6.4% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + David Maxson19756% games+5.4% vs expected
David Maxson + Bruce Thornquist13461% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kurt Fenton
33W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
4.5
David Maxson
74W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
Patrick Angelo
57W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Craig Berry
97W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
John Gatz
163W–116L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Matt Burghgraef
121W–41L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Bruce Thornquist
236W–97L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dennis Markey
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Boruff
84W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Kevin Podwika
361W–203L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Patrick Seermon
116W–61L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Jay Goldner
127W–51L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Dal Bristow
65W–51L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Gabriel Gonzalez
41W–73L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
3
Eric Esancy
154W–187L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Howard Hoff
31W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Modica
96W–70L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shiv Baloo
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.