Teams

C 7.5W SP2 Gray

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-23vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Green / Patty Bennett vs Susan Aey / Joan Kerosky6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMAGGIE GRAY / Michelle Sutton vs AMY HENDRICKS / Laurie Loreno6-2, 6-2
2025-11-09vs C 7.5W NR BartramWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristie Tonsing / Kari Knoll vs Yue Bruckner / Natalie Levinson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGina Costanzo / Patty Bennett vs Lynne Hanna / Julia Bartram6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMAGGIE GRAY / Michelle Sutton vs Annette Lipaj / Mary Mays6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-26vs C 7.5W LT RugglesWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Greene / Jennifer Kirchner vs Rebekka Hom / Megan Ha6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaula Cutillo / MAGGIE GRAY vs Christina Reeves / Kristin Lenton6-4, 6-3
2025-10-17vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kirchner / Patty Bennett vs Hanadi Abdul-Aal / Sawsan Marrache4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Greene / MAGGIE GRAY vs Laurie Loreno / Bianca Collins7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs C 7.5W NR BartramLost 12
L#1 DoublesMAGGIE GRAY / Kari Knoll vs Yue Bruckner / Amy Grace5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kirchner / Barbara Greene vs Annette Lipaj / Samantha Jameson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Ferguson / Paula Cutillo vs Lisa Gallagher / Ashley Frazier6-1, 6-1
2025-09-21vs C 7.5W LT RugglesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kirchner / Barbara Greene vs Christina Reeves / Alicia Blessing4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Stein / MAGGIE GRAY vs Heather Wentz / Karyn Loveless6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W KI Lightner9124614192
2C 7.5W PW1 Boeckman9124616200
3C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick82191127251
4C 7.5W SP2 Gray64171333267
5C 7.5W NC Gamby5316820178
6C 7.5W GR Daily53131123187
7C 7.5W WR Petty55181231271
8C 7.5W MV2 Zhang55161433268
9C 7.5W NR Bartram55161434269
10C 7.5W CC Garson44121225191
11C 7.5W TP Schaffner44111330247
12C 7.5W AVB Hendricks46141637278
13C 7.5W LT Ruggles3792142274
14C 7.5W PW2 Dewerth37102043322
15C 7.5W SP1 Grauel2681633236
16C 7.5W CSC Goldberg2852551335
17C 7.5W CRC Ro1982248326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darcy Morris
published 4
3.71
MAGGIE GRAY
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.66
Gina Costanzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
3.61
Kristie Tonsing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Barbara Greene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Jennifer Kirchner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Patty Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chris Catanese
published 3.5
3.22
Michelle Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Kari Knoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Paula Cutillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Della Michalos
published 3.5
Kathy Green
published
Kimberly Stein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Green + Kristie Tonsing14857% games+9.1% vs expected
Kathy Green + Amanda Nierzwicki5172% games+7.2% vs expected
Amanda Nierzwicki + Darcy Morris8257% games+3.6% vs expected
MAGGIE GRAY + Jennifer Kirchner211852% games+1.2% vs expected
Barbara Greene + Jennifer Kirchner2447% games−2.0% vs expected
Chris Catanese + Della Michalos5547% games−4.8% vs expected
Darcy Morris + Michelle Sutton7056% games−7.1% vs expected
Patty Bennett + Michelle Sutton2542% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcy Morris
47W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MAGGIE GRAY
142W–88L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Gina Costanzo
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
4
Amanda Nierzwicki
57W–27L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kristie Tonsing
65W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Barbara Greene
84W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Kirchner
82W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Patty Bennett
48W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Chris Catanese
35W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Sutton
116W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Kari Knoll
36W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Paula Cutillo
21W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Della Michalos
56W–63L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Kathy Green
54W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Stein
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.