Teams

C 7.5W TP Schaffner

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-23vs C 7.5W SP1 GrauelWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Fox / Kristi Schulte vs Laurel Marsillo / Sarah Grauel6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErin Baginski / Carolyn Cheverine vs Alison Snook / Julie Trende1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHannah Lindesmith / Michelle Fox vs Donna Reynolds / Michelle Blanda7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-15vs C 7.5W NC GambySplit 11
W#1 DoublesCora Shane / Carolyn Cheverine vs Kay McHolm / Stephanie Bailey6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesErin Gray / Robin Rohrig vs Cindy Gamby / Kylee Mathie4-6, 1-6
2025-11-07vs C 7.5W CC GarsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Lindesmith / Lori Young vs Marnie Walcutt / Michelle Kuhn7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristianne Bontempo / Robin Rohrig vs Colleen Rice / Haley Jividen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-18vs C 7.5W SP1 GrauelWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelby Schaffner / Kristi Schulte vs Susan Miller / Ashley Wallace2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Baginski / Terri Conner vs Michelle Blanda / Julie Trende4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Petit / Lori Young vs Lisa Sharp / Marisa Fatica6-4, 7-5
2025-10-10vs C 7.5W NC GambyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCora Shane / Amanda Petit vs Michelle Simmons / Stephanie Bailey6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristianne Bontempo / Lori Young vs Renee Weaver / Valerie Johnson7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesErin Gray / Johanna Nelsen vs Kylee Mathie / Ashley Bullach2-6, 5-7
2025-10-03vs C 7.5W CC GarsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Hilborn / Johanna Nelsen vs Beth Smith / Shelby Novick3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Baginski / Mary Sanders vs Marnie Walcutt / Mary Maleski2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLori Young / Kristi Schulte vs Haley Jividen / Colleen Rice2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W KI Lightner9124614192
2C 7.5W PW1 Boeckman9124616200
3C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick82191127251
4C 7.5W SP2 Gray64171333267
5C 7.5W NC Gamby5316820178
6C 7.5W GR Daily53131123187
7C 7.5W WR Petty55181231271
8C 7.5W MV2 Zhang55161433268
9C 7.5W NR Bartram55161434269
10C 7.5W CC Garson44121225191
11C 7.5W TP Schaffner44111330247
12C 7.5W AVB Hendricks46141637278
13C 7.5W LT Ruggles3792142274
14C 7.5W PW2 Dewerth37102043322
15C 7.5W SP1 Grauel2681633236
16C 7.5W CSC Goldberg2852551335
17C 7.5W CRC Ro1982248326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Cora Shane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Shelby Schaffner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Kristianne Bontempo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Erin Baginski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Hannah Lindesmith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Brooke Kaylor
published 3.5
3.40
Jamie Hilborn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Carolyn Cheverine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Amanda Petit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kristi Schulte
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Lisa Lutz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Johanna Nelsen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.96
Terri Conner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Rebecca Voris
published
2.68
Robin Rohrig
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Erin Gray
published
Jamie Fox
published
Lori Young
published
Mary Sanders
published
Michelle Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Baginski + Lisa Lutz5259% games+8.6% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Kristianne Bontempo3553% games+8.2% vs expected
Erin Baginski + Erin Gray10754% games+7.5% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Erin Gray3252% games+6.9% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Jamie Fox6452% games+2.4% vs expected
Jamie Fox + Kristianne Bontempo8654% games+1.9% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Erin Baginski111351% games−0.2% vs expected
Erin Gray + Kristianne Bontempo2445% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cora Shane
78W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.94
Shelby Schaffner
73W–114L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kristianne Bontempo
57W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Erin Baginski
91W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Hannah Lindesmith
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brooke Kaylor
58W–62L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Jamie Hilborn
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Carolyn Cheverine
133W–140L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Amanda Petit
120W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristi Schulte
50W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lisa Lutz
56W–108L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Johanna Nelsen
46W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Terri Conner
40W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Rebecca Voris
51W–34L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Robin Rohrig
48W–76L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Erin Gray
79W–54L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Fox
54W–53L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Young
73W–80L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Sanders
57W–39L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Fox
69W–151L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.