Teams

C 7.5W MV2 Zhang

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs C 7.5W WR PettyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Ascha / Elizabeth Byrne vs Caterina Petty / Jo Ann FInk6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Chipo Jolibois vs Liz Clark / Beth Schwartz6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Mercuri / Pamela Zalba vs Wendy Cohn / Beth Jokhio4-6, 4-6
2025-11-02vs C 7.5W KI LightnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesChipo Jolibois / Marisa Fiucci Rosen vs Meryl Reams / Kelsey Ruddock6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Vinborg / Patricia Mercuri vs Milena Sterio / Kate Scovil2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Lisa Bockhoff vs Peyton Floyd / Claire Galiette6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-05vs C 7.5W WR PettyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Chuko / Lisa Bockhoff vs Arminda Parker / Courtney Foster4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMona Ascha / Chelsea Rogen vs Caterina Petty / Stephanie Sneed1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLishan Zhang / Janeen Miklowski vs Melissa Durbin / Beth Jokhio7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-09-28vs C 7.5W KI LightnerLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Mercuri / Pamela Zalba vs Hannah Ruddock / Marian Lauer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLishan Zhang / Lisa Bockhoff vs Elyse Lightner / Erica Wigton1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Vinborg / Karen Cipriani vs Peyton Floyd / Claire Galiette5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W KI Lightner9124614192
2C 7.5W PW1 Boeckman9124616200
3C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick82191127251
4C 7.5W SP2 Gray64171333267
5C 7.5W NC Gamby5316820178
6C 7.5W GR Daily53131123187
7C 7.5W WR Petty55181231271
8C 7.5W MV2 Zhang55161433268
9C 7.5W NR Bartram55161434269
10C 7.5W CC Garson44121225191
11C 7.5W TP Schaffner44111330247
12C 7.5W AVB Hendricks46141637278
13C 7.5W LT Ruggles3792142274
14C 7.5W PW2 Dewerth37102043322
15C 7.5W SP1 Grauel2681633236
16C 7.5W CSC Goldberg2852551335
17C 7.5W CRC Ro1982248326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Chelsea Rogen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Janeen Miklowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Marisa Fiucci Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Kristin Chuko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Karen Cipriani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Pamela Zalba
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Chipo Jolibois
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Lisa Bockhoff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Mona Ascha
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Susan Vinborg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Patricia Mercuri
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Lishan Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Lenahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Zalba + Lishan Zhang7254% games+8.7% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Kristin Chuko10357% games+6.7% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Patricia Mercuri6356% games+6.2% vs expected
Susan Lenahan + Lishan Zhang5254% games+5.2% vs expected
Chipo Jolibois + Pamela Zalba1446% games+2.1% vs expected
Chipo Jolibois + Lishan Zhang3742% games+1.9% vs expected
Patricia Mercuri + Kristin Chuko9751% games+0.1% vs expected
Janeen Miklowski + Chipo Jolibois3250% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chelsea Rogen
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
Janeen Miklowski
77W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Marisa Fiucci Rosen
61W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kristin Chuko
215W–144L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Karen Cipriani
86W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pamela Zalba
149W–136L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Chipo Jolibois
85W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lisa Bockhoff
30W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Mona Ascha
34W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Susan Vinborg
43W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.33
Patricia Mercuri
171W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Lishan Zhang
132W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Susan Lenahan
45W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.