Teams

C 7.5W NC Gamby

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-23vs C 7.5W GR DailyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Gamby / Stephanie Houston vs Emma Deluca / Katarina Jovanovic4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKay McHolm / Michelle Evanto vs Melissa Owen / Tara Bowers5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRenee Weaver / Kim Broadwater vs Julie Deluca / Christina Terzola4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-15vs C 7.5W TP SchaffnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKay McHolm / Stephanie Bailey vs Cora Shane / Carolyn Cheverine1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCindy Gamby / Kylee Mathie vs Erin Gray / Robin Rohrig6-4, 6-1
2025-10-25vs C 7.5W CC GarsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Evanto / Molly White vs Colleen Rice / Shelby Novick6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrina Kelley / Kim Broadwater vs Tisha Bell / Kymberlyn King6-0, 6-1
2025-10-17vs C 7.5W GR DailyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Gamby / Stephanie Bailey vs Loralee Daily / Michelle Ross6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMolly White / Kim Broadwater vs Melissa Owen / Rochelle Kaiser6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichelle Simmons / Stephanie Houston vs Trisha Kohut / Denise Fehr6-1, 6-0
2025-10-10vs C 7.5W TP SchaffnerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRenee Weaver / Valerie Johnson vs Kristianne Bontempo / Lori Young6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKylee Mathie / Ashley Bullach vs Erin Gray / Johanna Nelsen6-2, 7-5
2025-09-19vs C 7.5W CC GarsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Simmons / Ashley Bullach vs Rosemary Cugliari / Meghan McCaulley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly White / Stephanie Houston vs Natalie Marotta / Marnie Walcutt6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRenee Weaver / Kylee Mathie vs Colleen Rice / Shelby Novick6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W KI Lightner9124614192
2C 7.5W PW1 Boeckman9124616200
3C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick82191127251
4C 7.5W SP2 Gray64171333267
5C 7.5W NC Gamby5316820178
6C 7.5W GR Daily53131123187
7C 7.5W WR Petty55181231271
8C 7.5W MV2 Zhang55161433268
9C 7.5W NR Bartram55161434269
10C 7.5W CC Garson44121225191
11C 7.5W TP Schaffner44111330247
12C 7.5W AVB Hendricks46141637278
13C 7.5W LT Ruggles3792142274
14C 7.5W PW2 Dewerth37102043322
15C 7.5W SP1 Grauel2681633236
16C 7.5W CSC Goldberg2852551335
17C 7.5W CRC Ro1982248326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Cindy Gamby
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.79
Kay McHolm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Molly White
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.64
Renee Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Trina Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Kim Broadwater
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Stephanie Houston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.30
Ashley Bullach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Michelle Evanto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Kylee Mathie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Simmons
published
Valerie Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay McHolm + Michelle Evanto3259% games+8.5% vs expected
Stephanie Houston + Ashley Bullach7555% games+5.9% vs expected
Renee Weaver + Kay McHolm7555% games+1.5% vs expected
Kim Broadwater + Ashley Bullach9457% games+1.2% vs expected
Michelle Simmons + Valerie Johnson191054% games−1.0% vs expected
Molly White + Renee Weaver131052% games−6.8% vs expected
Trina Kelley + Renee Weaver2547% games−9.0% vs expected
Molly White + Trina Kelley6357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Gamby
101W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Kay McHolm
124W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Molly White
104W–59L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Renee Weaver
112W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Trina Kelley
32W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kim Broadwater
41W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Stephanie Houston
81W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
Ashley Bullach
131W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Michelle Evanto
91W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kylee Mathie
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Michelle Simmons
77W–38L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Johnson
36W–52L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.