Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesAmanda DeBord / Sue Taylor vs Gloria Spencer / Lory Morar7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSue Taylor vs Courtney Bock6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesSamanda Dorger / Sue Taylor vs Monica Ravanello / Tracy Dennis2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Kristen Calise
published
3.76
Deirdre Burke
published 4
3.60
Eleanor Cooper
published 4
3.50
Amanda DeBord
published 3.5
3.50
Christine Malloy
published 3.5
3.47
Virginia Freeland
published
3.36
Nicoletta Camerin
published
3.31
Brie Cadman
published 3.5
3.30
Annika Fischer
published 3.5
3.23
Samanda Dorger
published
3.17
Judith Alex
published
3.15
Lindsey Levine
published
3.15
Sue Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Jennifer Locke
published
3.05
Jessica Thornton
published
3.05
Michelle van de Pol
published
2.94
Kathleen Herrera
published
2.87
Kristi Kaiser
published
2.71
Rowchelle Julian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samanda Dorger + Amanda DeBord5058% games+10.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Calise
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Deirdre Burke
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Eleanor Cooper
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Amanda DeBord
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Christine Malloy
12W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Virginia Freeland
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Nicoletta Camerin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Brie Cadman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Annika Fischer
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Samanda Dorger
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Judith Alex
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
Lindsey Levine
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sue Taylor
55W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Locke
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jessica Thornton
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Michelle van de Pol
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kathleen Herrera
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Kristi Kaiser
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.87
Rowchelle Julian
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.