Teams

Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday

2026 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 5.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Michael Parker vs Peter Whitehurst / Marcus Simon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesOwen Vescio / Edward Wells vs Howard Driggers / J Stacey Allred6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Shepard Moore vs Marcus Simon / Peter Whitehurst6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNicholas Baxendell / Ron Mangrum vs Howard Driggers / Myron Herron3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Shepard Moore vs Conrad Nowogrodzki / Peter Whitehurst6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTommy Houston / Jack Oldis vs Aaron Charles Pascua / Ako Barnes6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEdward Wells / Robert Wells vs J Stacey Allred / Howard Driggers2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Shepard Moore vs Conrad Nowogrodzki / Peter Whitehurst6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesOwen Vescio / Tommy Houston vs Ako Barnes / Keenan Kaltenbacher6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicholas Baxendell / Robert Wells vs Myron Herron / J Stacey Allred5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTommy Houston / Jack Oldis vs Ako Barnes / Aaron Charles Pascua6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Wells / Edward Wells vs Howard Driggers / J Stacey Allred7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Shepard Moore vs Marcus Simon / Cameron Smith6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Shepard Moore vs Marcus Simon / Peter Whitehurst6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTommy Houston / Michael Parker vs Ako Barnes / Dan Clemson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Wells / Nicholas Baxendell vs Art Fadde / J Stacey Allred6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
John Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.64
Shepard Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Caleb Dawson
published 4.5
4.34
Jack Oldis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Tommy Houston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Owen Vescio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jack Walsh
published 4
3.56
Ron Mangrum
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Robert Wells
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.50
Edward Wells
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Nicholas Baxendell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Wells + Edward Wells1433% games−10.2% vs expected
Shepard Moore + John Hankinson5065% gamesnot enough data
John Hankinson + Nicholas Baxendell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hankinson
35W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
Shepard Moore
35W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Caleb Dawson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Jack Oldis
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
Tommy Houston
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Owen Vescio
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.25
4
Jack Walsh
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Ron Mangrum
14W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Robert Wells
9W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Edward Wells
2W–5L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Nicholas Baxendell
4W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.