Teams

Bushnell - Tri-Level 18s 2.5/3.0/3.5

2022 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Emily Wilson vs Leigh Abraham / Stephanie Bettinger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Emily Wilson vs Katie Boon / Sophie Holt6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Vicki Amendum vs Gina Goy / Kristin Williamson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Ashton Choros
published 3
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.78
Gail Terrell
published 3
2.74
Amy Mooney
published 3
2.60
Andrea Bushnell
published 3
2.57
Simara Levi
published
2.02
Sophia de Vries
published
Melinda Billings
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dover
41W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Ashton Choros
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Amy Mooney
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Andrea Bushnell
1W–40L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Simara Levi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Sophia de Vries
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.